[getsmart-l] The Peak Oil Crisis: The GAO Report
23skidoo
23skidoo at ica.net
Thu Apr 5 00:33:46 EDT 2007
The evidence for an imminent peak is much better than the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) makes out here folks just as many Peak Oil activists have been screaming..
Them G- men might be tuning in now ,but the song remains the same and the music is playing a bit faster than they seem able to dance to.
We've said it before and we might as well say it again...
Best plan for alternatives to oil that are sane, clean and affordable (which therefore excludes nuclear)
Meanwhile on the list of what NOT to do...
Ya gotta hand it to Ex Alberta Premier Ralph Klein.
Good old Ralph must of left that show on automatic 'upside down' cuz they're now planning to use nuclear to turn the once untouchable tar sands into oil.
Why depend on one horse with no game when real fools can afford two?
He should have thanked them Green Peace activists who politely put solar panels on his house to turn his lights on sort to speak - to point a way out, but instead he had them charged with mischief?!
Most of us are going to face the reality of Peak Oil the hard way it seems because as usual our system of governance is only capable of knee jerk reactionary remedies and sadly still prone to blindly accepting the disinformation from its very own wise guys who've turned out to be mere dupes of high priced corporate lobbyists.
Film at 11:00
***
http://www.fcnp.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1088&It...
The Peak Oil Crisis: The GAO Report
By Tom Whipple
Thursday, 05 April 2007
Last week the Government Accountability Office released its long-awaited
report on peak oil. This report is clearly a milestone on our journey through
the oil age for it is the first time the staff of a major government agency
has looked at the issue and concluded that peak oil is real and, if it occurs
soon, could cause a world-wide recession. Even more notable is that the
Departments of Energy and Interior generally agreed with the conclusions.
There is little in the report those following the peak oil story do not
already know:
a.. The US, as the worlds biggest consumer of oil, is the most
vulnerable to the consequences of peaking;
b.. Sixty percent of the worlds oil reserves now are controlled by
unstable countries;
c.. At best, the US could only hope to replace about 4 percent of its
liquid fuel consumption with alternatives by 2015;
d.. A hydrogen-based economy is not in the immediate cards;
e.. And, most importantly, the US government had better get its act
together soon to do something about all this.
Now we all know that the key question about peak oil is when will it
happen, and its corollary, when will the economic troubles begin? For those
of you who understand American football, the GAO simply punted by concluding
that peak production come anywhere between now and 2040 thereby removing any
sense of urgency from the issue. If it comes soon, peak oil could have serious
consequences. If it comes later, things might not be so bad.
By adopting this rather ingenious position, the GAO staff saved
themselves a lot of grief and a lot of controversy, but got everybody on board
the Departments of Energy and Interior, the EIA, the IAE, and maybe even
ExxonMobil and its anti-peak oil friends over at Cambridge Energy Research.
Judging from the blogs, most people following and writing about peak oil
are outraged at the preposterous judgment that the most that can be said about
the timing of peak oil is sometime in the next 33 years. The evidence for an
imminent peak is much better than the GAO makes out.
However, lets turn the story around for a minute. Suppose the GAO staff
really had studied and debated the evidence and concluded, as others have,
that world oil production has already plateaued if not peaked. Suppose, they
went on to say it is unlikely that world oil production will ever again
increase significantly and that when you throw in all geopolitical factors
wars, insurgencies, expropriations, bad governments the amount of oil
available for importing countries is likely to drop sharply very soon.
If they were in a candid mood, the GAO could have added and by the way,
kiss any expectations of robust economic growth you might have goodbye. It
simply is not going to happen for a long, long while.
The GAO could make an even bigger splash by convincing the president to
go on prime time tell the American people that all available evidence leads to
the conclusion that, soon, gasoline will be too expensive for them to afford.
They should immediately sell their gas guzzlers, put their over-mortgaged
houses on the market, stop using credit cards, dump all their stocks, and
plant a garden.
For obvious reasons no president will ever make such a speech. Despite
quiet preparations for peak oil in many countries around the world, no
national leader has as yet said anything similar the consequences are simply
too unpredictable.
For equally obvious reasons, no responsible government agency will ever
officially conclude that serious economic problems are coming soon for the
immediate consequences could be needlessly severe. Those who had hoped the GAO
report would once and for all confirm that peak oil theory was right and that
world oil production was hovering at the edge of a collapse were bound to be
disappointed.
It is more likely that the world will muddle its way into the era of
peak oil in much the way it has muddled into global warming. Various segments
of the population will catch on to the problem at various times amidst much
fussing, fuming, and denial.
Thus, the real dilemma of coping peak oil, for a while at least, is
really quite simple. If the government should lay out the full ramifications
of peaking in hopes of rallying the people to make preparations, the most
immediate consequence is likely to be serious economic setback triggered by an
unambiguous announcement itself.
The alternative is to remain silent. Leave the future a bit murky with
room for hope. Don't panic anybody into selling assets or husbanding their
money with talk of an unaffordable future. Talk about reducing dependence of
foreign oil instead. This carries the implication that the foreign oil will
always be there in an emergency and that reducing dependence will be a matter
of patriotic choice not necessity.
As no responsible government wants to see economic troubles start any
sooner than absolutely necessary, there will probably never be a strong,
clear, unambiguous, widely disseminated report on the timing of peak oil. The
National Petroleum Council is poised to pronounce on the issue in the next few
months. It would not be surprising if they come up with a formulation similar
to the GAOs. If governments have their way, we will stumble into peak oil
over a period of years during which gasoline prices cycle inexorably upwards
and various compensating actions are take.
So there you have it. The GAO did their job by warning the Congress that
peak oil might just be a very serious problem very soon, and the DOW is still
going up. Sometimes government agencies are not that dumb after all!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.web.net/archives/getsmart-l/attachments/20070405/6c221405/attachment.htm
More information about the getsmart-l
mailing list