Sludge Watch ==> New Hampshire Rule Change - switch to Public Relations Spin for Sludges?
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Sun Jul 9 15:43:39 EDT 2006
July 14,2006
To: New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services
From: The New Hampshire Sierra Club
Re: Rule Changes to Env-Ws-800
The New Hampshire Sierra Club appreciates the opportunity to comment
about the rule changes to Env-Ws-800, which propose changing the term
treated municipal sewage sludge to biosolids, and the term industrial
paper mill sludge to short paper fiber.
ENV-WQ 802.06
Biosolids is not the correct legal or regulatory term for this
contaminated waste. The federal regulatory documents refer to land applied
sludge, as treated municipal sewage sludge or sewage sludge that meets
the land application requirements as stipulated in CFR 40 Part 503, or just
plain sewage sludge.
In 1991, the sewerage industry, paid a public relations firm to conduct a
name changing contest, not to clarify what sewage sludge is, but to make
the practice of land applying this contaminated waste product more
acceptable to the public.(1) A professor at the University of Arizona
invented the name biosolids. Subsequently, the sewerage industry and the
companies profiting from land application intensely lobbied a number of
publishing companies to include the word biosolids in their dictionaries.
In short, the term biosolids is a recent invention to verbally detoxify a
material that the Federal Clean Water Act has always defined as a
pollutant.(2).
Whereas treated municipal sewage sludge or sewage sludge that is land
applied clearly describes the nature and source of this material, the word
biosolids needs to be described and defined before it can be understood;
this is leading to considerable confusion among the public, legislators, and
regulators. Even in the peer reviewed scientific literature, biosolids
denotes very different materials. For example biosolids has been used to
refer to animal manures, to septage, to a number of different industrial
waste products, or simply to marketable residuals products.
Most publications now interchange the terms biosolidsand land applied
sludge. However, several regulatory agencies and those promoting land
application, have transformed the confusion about the two terms into
outright deception by assuring concerned neighbors next to land application
sites that what is being spread is not treated sludge but biosolids.
To avoid this confusion in terminology, we strongly urge DES, to use the
more accurate federal and legally correct term land-applied municipal
sewage sludge. Biosolids is clearly a promotional term, prescribing rather
than describing a controversial material; state regulatory agencies should
not be in the business of promoting a practice or product that they regulate
by changing the name of the product. This is especially relevant to land
application of sewage sludge, since EPA is no longer promoting sludge
farming because of serious questions that have been raised by the scientific
community and the public about the safety, benefits, and sustainability of
this increasingly controversial practice.
ENV-WSQ 802.05
The term beneficial used in conjunction with the New Hampshire
definition of biosolids in RSA 485-A:2 XII - XII and in the proposed rule
changes is also advocacy, reflecting a viewpoint no longer shared by the
scientific community, and should be deleted from all references in the New
Hampshire rules and statutes. Neither the National Academy of Sciences, nor
any of the various dictionary definitions of the word biosolids use the
adjective beneficial.(3) Furthermore, the NH Sierra Club believes that
using the word beneficial in the New Hampshire statutes and rules may
violate the intent of the NH General Court. In 2000 a bill establishing a
beneficial use and promotion policy for sludge farming was defeated in
committee and by the General Court. (4)
ENV-WSQ 802:33
Just as biosolids is an attempt to verbally detoxify a complex
contaminated waste product, so short paper fiber covers up the fact that
this material is an industrial waste product. There are virtually no peer
reviewed scientific papers, or risk assessments dealing with the risks of
land applying paper mill sludges. The material is quite different from
sewage sludge and should not even be governed by the same rules or
regulations. Its use in NH has led to some serious ground water
contamination problems (5).
Finally, the New Hampshire Sierra Club hopes that in the next rule making or
legislative session, the NH DES and the General Court will move beyond
terminology and focus on substantive issues that will address the many
serious weaknesses in the states land application management rules, and
incorporate the 2002 and 2003 recommendations of the national Sierra
Club.(6) We also urge DES to explore and consider 21st century solutions to
managing the states unrecyclable wastes (7). Long-term, a policy that
deliberately adds persistent pollutants to the nations farm and forest soil
is indefensible.(8)
References:
1. Wikipedia definition of biosolids:
The Water Environment Federation (WEF) formally recognized the term
biosolids in 1991 and it is in common use throughout the world as of 2004.
The Water Environment Federation is the water and wastewater industry's main
trade and lobby organization in the USA. "Biosolids" is the term created in
1991 by the "Name Change Task Force" at WEF to make the land application of
processed sewage sludge more acceptable to the U.S. public. Biosolids are
the nutrient rich solid material that is produced during the treatment of
domestic wastewater at a treatment facility. Solid materials are removed
from sewage during the wastewater treatment process. During treatment,
bacteria and other microorganisms break components in the wastewater down
into simpler and more stable forms of organic matter. Non-organic matter
also settles into sludge. For instance, heavy metals and other toxic
materials, including flame retardants (PBDEs) and persistent organic
pollutants, are commonly found in sewage sludge. What does not settle into
sludge leaves the treatment facility as a treated wastewater effluent.
According to USEPA, biosolids that meet treatment and pollutant content
criteria "can be safely recycled and applied as fertilizer to sustainably
improve and maintain productive soils and stimulate plant growth." EPA
policy on sewage sludge recycling is highly controversial. Often thought to
consist of only "human waste," sewage sludge, or its public relations term,
"biosolids," in fact contains all materials from cities which the treatment
can remove from wastewater. After the 1991 Congressional ban on ocean
dumping, the USEPA instituted a policy of disposing of sludge on
agricultural land. EPA promoted this policy by presenting it as recycling.
But with more and more incidents of illness reported, there has been
increasing concern among scientists about the disposal of sewage sludge on
land.
2. Snyder C. The Dirty Work of Promoting Recycling of Americas Sewage
Sludge.
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health (2005) 11,4
page 148.
3. The National Research Council, Biosolids Applied to Land (2002) National
Academy Press. Page 13: biosolids: sewage sludge that has been treated to
meet the land application standards in the Part 503 rule or any other
equivalent land-application standards.
Marriam-Websters Collegiate Dictionary (1998) biosolids: organic matter
recovered from a sewage treatment process and used esp. as fertilizer.
New Oxford Dictionary of English (1998): biosolids: organic matter recycled
from sewage especially for use in agriculture.
The American Heritage Dictionary. biosolids: Solid or semisolid material
obtained from treated wastewater, often used as fertilizer.
4. HB 1252(2000) An Act establishing a beneficial use policy for wastewater
sludge.
5. Rueggeberg C. et al The Sludge Scam (Part 2) New Hampshire Sierran
pages 6-7.
6. Sierra Club Guidance on the Land Application of Sewage Sludges.(2002)
and EPA Response to the NRC Report Biosolids Applied to Land. Public
Comment and Recommendations to the US EPA from the Sierra Club. May 21,
2003.
7. The Sludge Scam (Part 2) page 8.
Prepared by Caroline Synder PhD
More information about the Sludgewatch-l
mailing list