Sludge Watch ==> Controversial Report on Dioxin Released - Find Chlorine Industries Stalled Study

[maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca]

http://www.huntingtonnews.net/state/060712-staff-dioxin.html


July 12, 2006

Study Concludes Dioxin is Toxic; Widely Used Chemical Causes Cancer, Birth 
Defects, Developmental Problems

By HNN Staff

Huntington, WV (HNN) -- The National Academies National Research Council 
released a controversial report on July 11, 2006 confirming what numerous 
scientific panels have concluded over the past 15 years: dioxin is a potent 
cancer-causing chemical. Chlorine-based industries have been effectively 
stalling the release of the EPA’s controversial dioxin reassessment for 15 
years.

“In the 1950s Monsanto dumped chemical waste at sites along Heizer and 
Manila creeks near Poca. Since at least the 70s, fish downstream in the 
Kanawha River have been found to have excessively high levels of dioxin.

Apparent high cancer rates in the area have fueled long-time concerns that 
dioxin is poisoning nearby communities,” said Vivian Stockman, project 
coordinator with the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition (OVEC).

“The chemical companies, the federal EPA and the state DEP have done little 
that really cleans up the contamination. Although this latest report 
basically says nothing new, no one can any longer pretend the science isn’t 
there. Delaying cleanup any longer is inexcusable,” Stockman said.

“There’s a huge breakdown of communication between the agencies that are 
supposed to be cleaning up the area,” said Renae Bonnett, a Poca resident 
who has been working to get her community cleaned-up for about 15 years.

“People who have jobs in the agencies seem to be inactive on this issue.

They just wait for volunteers to light a fire under them. This report should 
light that fire. The agencies should finally understand they need to 
communicate with another and take action now. So many people’s health and 
well being depends on it.”

Besides cancer, dioxin can also cause developmental and immune effects at 
levels close to those currently found in the general population. Every 
American eats dioxin when they consume fatty foods, and nearly every 
American has measurable levels of this chemical in their body.

“The first health assessment of dioxin was in 1985," said Lois Gibbs, 
Executive Director of the Center for Health, Environment and Justice (CHEJ).

Gibbs’s struggle to clean up dioxin in her Niagara Falls, NY community at 
Love Canal has been credited with launching the grassroots environmental 
health movement. During the late 1990s, when OVEC members were working to 
defeat a proposed pulp mill that would have spewed dioxin into West 
Virginia’s air and water, Gibbs came to Huntington to educate the public 
about the dangerous toxin.

“Over the past 21 years, chlorine-based industries have demanded reviews, 
reassessments and analysis. Each re-assessment and review affirmed the 
findings and newer scientific data continues to strengthen the conclusions 
that dioxin is a serious public health threat. The chlorine-based industry 
is following the tobacco industry's strategies to keep information from the 
public. Enough is enough—let's get on with establishing health protective 
regulations around dioxin discharges and clean ups,” said Gibbs.

Dioxin is a known human carcinogen, active in the body at very small levels.

Scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have long concluded 
dioxin is highly toxic, but a strong coalition of industries responsible for 
generating the byproduct toxicant have successfully stalled progress on a 
15-year study of the chemical. The EPA study—called the “Dioxin 
Reassessment”—still remains a draft, which has stymied the agency’s 
development of federal regulations. However, EPA recently set a major 
precedent when they set the soil clean up goal for dioxin at 30 parts per 
trillion (ppt) at the Escambia Wood Treating Co. Superfund site in 
Pensacola, FL.

The NA review was the result of a last-minute amendment to the 2003 EPA 
appropriations bill which required NA to review EPA's reassessment if a 
White House interagency task force did not reach consensus on its review of 
the draft report. This NA review is the latest in a series of reviews 
largely orchestrated by the powerful set of industries that generate dioxin 
including some chemical manufacturers, pulp and paper companies, smelting 
and incinerator companies.

“The fingerprints of the chlorine-based industry have been evident in 
earlier scientific reviews, and there is concern about this review as well,” 
said Stephen Lester, CHEJ Science Director. “In past reviews a major point 
of debate advocated by dioxin generating industries has been the use of a 
model to calculate cancer risk that assumes some dioxin exposures are too 
small to cause harm—a dangerous approach which EPA has repeatedly rejected 
in the past. The debate over the validity of this model has been injected 
into every review for over 18 years by dioxin-generating industries and has 
led to repeated delays in finalizing the report.”

Dioxin has been found in milk, cheese, beef, pork, fish, chicken, birds, 
deer, turkey, squirrel, and worms, as well as soil and sewage sludge.

For more information, see "Chronological History of US EPA's Public Health 
Assessment of Dioxin" and "Dioxin Fact Sheet" at www.chej.org/ dioxin.

For more on the dioxin problems at Poca, see:

http://www.ohvec.org/galleries/people_in_action/2000/06_09/index.html