Sludge Watch ==> Kern : Rural County Rejects Big City Sludge on Farmland
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Thu Jun 8 00:38:45 EDT 2006
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/14764254.htm
San Jose Mercury News
Rural county rejects big city sewage on farmland
JULIANA BARBASSA
Associated Press
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. - Urban centers in Southern California will have to find
some other place to dump their sewage after their rural neighbors to the
north voted overwhelmingly to stop them from spreading treated human waste
on farmland.
Each year, Kern County's open fields take in over 450,000 tons of treated
human waste trucked from Los Angeles and other urban centers. The mixture is
spread on land used to grow cattle feed.
While some residents swore by it, saying the sludge has no pathogens after
treatment and works well as fertilizer, other residents worried that the
unsavory mixture could seep into the region's water, increase air pollution
or taint the name of Kern's $3.5 billion agricultural industry, though
sludge is never applied to crops consumed by humans.
Critics prevailed, with 82.69 percent of county voters saying they don't
want sludge applied to their land anymore.
"It's time to start cleaning up our back yard, and the first step is to get
neighbors to stop throwing stuff over the fence," said Larry Pearson,
councilman for the rural farming town of Wasco.
Pearson was a fierce advocate of the measure. About 15 miles from Wasco a
1,280-acre sludge application site owned by the city of Oxnard takes in
24,000 tons of treated waste a year.
The practice of using treated waste as fertilizer took off in the early
1990s when U.S. Environmental Protection Agency decided that applying
treated sewage to farmland as fertilizer was preferable to sending it out to
sea or pouring it in landfills.
Kern County's vast expanse of inexpensive land and its location, just across
the Tehachapi mountains from the Los Angeles basin, made it an attractive
option.
But residents in the area resented being seen as a dumping ground. A picture
of a two-story outhouse, the top labeled "L.A. County" and the bottom
labeled "Kern County" illustrated the Web site for the campaign to pass
Measure E, and likely represented the feelings of many in the region.
"This county's been under siege, taking in one-third of California's
sludge," said Sen. Dean Florez, D-Shafter. "They're finally taking their
well-being into their own hands."
Now the urban areas that chose Kern's land as a solution for their waste
management problems and invested money in the scheme are scrambling for an
alternative.
Los Angeles has been sending about two dozen tanker trucks of sewage a day
to Kern County since 1994. In 2000, it spent $9.3 million to buy Green
Acres, the 4,688-acre farm where it was applying its waste.
In 2000, when Kern County decided to take only sludge that's been cooked at
high temperatures to kill pathogens, the city invested another $40 million
into its treatment system to comply.
It was costly, but all other options are even more expensive, said Diane
Gilbert Jones, with Los Angeles' sanitation department.
"We are looking at technologies that are not readily available, at
continuing to land-apply in other areas, farther away," she said. "We're not
closing our minds to anything."
Cities and counties have six months to comply with the measure, or face
fines of $500 a day.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: outhouse.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 34444 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://list.web.net/archives/sludgewatch-l/attachments/20060608/8d150252/attachment.gif
More information about the Sludgewatch-l
mailing list