Sludge Watch ==> Paper sludge 'berm' in Pelham - Assurances Little Comfort to Residents
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Mon Jun 26 12:58:37 EDT 2006
Sludgewatch Admin:
Looks like the Ministry of the Environment is now hiding the documents on
groundwater contamination underneath the berms....saying those are just
'historical' information, and they have failed to post those documents on
their 'Sound-Sorb Information' website.
Some of the Ministry staff have gone to great lengths to hide evidence of
groundwater contamination. First they said that the Polyaromatic
Hydrocarbon contamination under the berms must have come ....not from the
contamination in the berms (which are many times over the contaminated site
cleanup levels for hydrocarbons) but from the drilling mud from drilling the
test wells (the MOE staff did the oversight of this drilling).. Small
point: No drilling mud was used...and the MOE staff know it, since they
were there. Then the MOE said that maybe the ecoli contamination came from
the well drillers....(gosh, not from the berm which is over 100,000 tonnes
of soil matrix contaminated with as much as 500,000 ecoli per gram....) but
again from those dastardly well drillers.
The MOE were there...did the well drillers poop into the well? Did the
Ministry discuss these alleged acts of contamination with their contract
well drillers?
No.
The well drillers were never accused of these misdeeds, and they were
promptly and properly paid.
These tales of well driller pollution are fictions invented by our
government to support their own inaction on cleaning up these mountains of
leaching paper mill industrial sludges.
The Ministry keeps hoping that if they test infrequently enough that the
public will become discouraged and fail to protest their inaction and the
destruction of the quality of their drinking water source waters.
In the meanwhile, community after community suffers as the new dumping
ground for industry...while the Ministry takes our tax money and sits on its
hands. I understand the MOE refuse to test the groundwater at the Pelham
site...This way there will be no baseline test results andt they can claim
that any contamination at the site might have been there before the berms.
...................................................................................................
Printed from www.wellandtribune.ca web site
Friday, June 23, 2006
Welland Tribune
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assurances little comfort for residents; Meeting held on sound sorb issue
ALLAN BENNER
Thursday, June 22, 2006 - 09:00
Local News - What they're doing is legal.
"We operate under 100 per cent legal authority," said David Brenzil from
Empire Agri-Services Inc.
And Sound Sorb, the product his company is dumping to build a berm at 325
Church St. has been "tested and monitored to death," he told the crowd of
more than 150 people who gathered at the Fenwick Fire Hall Wednesday evening
for a special Town of Pelham council meeting. "This isn't something that's
new. It's been around for a long time." In fact, on his way to the fire hall
for the meeting, he said he passed several sites where Sound-Sorb has been
used in the last few years "without adverse effect."
And if the material was hazardous, he said the Ministry of the Environment
would not "let it go out of the gate of the plant."
His assurances, however, did little to satiate the Pelham area residents
concerned about the use of the paper fibre sludge - a byproduct of paper
recycling - to build the berm.
Councillors passed a motion Monday to demand that the government enact all
the recommendations of a report on Sound Sorb by an expert panel released 18
months ago. Until those recommendations are in place, council demanded that
an immediate moratorium on the building of all berms using Sound-Sorb be
suspended.
Carl Hipkiss lives next door to the berm about 200 yards away.
"Last night my daughter was going to bed and brushing her teeth. She asked
why the water was tasting and smelled funny," he recalled.
He's getting his water tested to make certain that the leachate produced by
the pile of sludge hasn't contaminated his cistern.
And the odour his family has had to contend with is "unbearable," he
complained. "You have to keep your windows shut and you doors closed."
His complaint was repeated by many people at the meeting.
When work on the berm began, Carolyn Botari said area residents knew little
about the paper fibre biosolids being used in its construction.
They reluctantly began looking for information about the material.
"The more we looked the more disturbing the information became," she said.
She said the material contains e-coli, fecal chloroform and other
potentially hazardous materials. Other dangerous materials only become
evident after years of decomposition of the Sound-Sorb berms. "The enormous
pile on Church Street, estimated to be 25,000 tonnes, has already begun to
decompose. Pools of orange, black, brown, purple and green liquids are
forming at the base of these berms. The leachate has already begun to seep
into the surface water of surrounding ditches and watercourses."
Sound-Sorb is not a controlled substance, and Ministry of Environment
district manager Paul Nieweglowski said that limits the MOE's control over
what's happening at 325 Church St.
However, Nieweglowski said the Ministry can take action if they can provide
evidence that it's having an adverse effect on the environment.
For that to happen, he said they need "good solid science behind it."
Since neighbours called the MOE about the berm, logging 40 complaints over
the past two months - the MOE has been to the site 16 times, Nieweglowski
said.
They've inspected the area and sampled the material along with ground water.
They've also worked with the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority to
address concerns about leachate running off the property.
A second smaller clay berm was added between the Sound-Sorb berm and area
ditches.
Nieweglowski couldn't estimate how long it would take before test results
are available, although he did make them a priority. "I can only say I've
asked for it as quickly as possible," he said.
When the results are ready, he said the information will be publicly
available. The MOE also tested for odour, determining on June 5 that there
was a problem.
Brenzil said his company is also responding to the concerns raised by
neighbouring residents. They've hired a third-party consultant.
"They had their people at the site and they're in the process right now of
putting together a report using highly technical equipment to monitor the
odour at the site and off site," he said.
When the report is ready it will be sent to the MOE directly from the
consultant. From there, the consultant will come up with a "viable solution
to mitigate the odour at the site," he said.
When the berm's complete, covered in topsoil with grass growing on it, he
said the "odour and run off from this material will be stopped."
But that's nearly two months away.
Trucks will continue dumping the sludge there for three more weeks. Then it
will need about a month to settle before the topsoil can be added.
By the time it's done, the L-shaped berm will be about 300 feet long by
70-feet wide in the north-south section, and 180 feet long by 70-feet wide
in the east-west section. In total, he said about 20,000 to 22,000 tonnes of
the material will be dumped there to build the berm. But that's a figure are
residents contested. Each of the more than 30 trucks that toll in there
every day carry more than 30 tonnes of the material. By the time the berm's
complete, Hipkiss estimated that somewhere between 80,000 and 100,000 tonnes
of the stuff would be piled there.
More information about the Sludgewatch-l
mailing list