Sludge Watch ==> The E. coli Free Market - Joel Bleifuss

Maureen Reilly maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Fri Nov 24 13:44:59 EST 2006


November 23, 2006
The E. coli Free Market
By Joel Bleifuss - In These Times - Chicago

Workers at a Earthbound Organic Farm/Natural Selection Foods farm in San 
Juan Bautista, Calif.

Since the advent of giant industrial enterprises in the late 19th century, 
corporate capitalism in the United States has been defined by its use of 
economies of scale to increase profits further enhanced by the die-off of 
those businesses unable to compete.

Today, vast corporate enterprise sprotected by a legal system that defines 
corporations as persons endowed with the same constitutional rights as 
flesh-and-blood people—control whole sectors of the U.S. economy, the 
three branches of government and the Fourth Estate (the mass media through 
which the public gets its information). The end result: an interconnected, 
self-reinforcing system of political powerful "Corporate America" that 
operates outside human control. (Of course, the machine is oiled by a class 
in thrall to their six, seven and eight figure paychecks.)

Concerns about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness aside, the problem 
with this system is that it is, ultimately, unsustainable. Not only does 
this corporate behemoth chew up and spit out the people it employs as wage 
slaves, it gorges on resources of the natural world, disrupting the balance 
of life on Earth.

And when humans fuck with Mother Nature, she extracts revenge. Look no 
further than the Arctic's drowning polar bears or the Sahara creeping 
deserts.

One could also look closer to home, to the 199 people fell who ill and the 
three who died after eating spinach contaminated with E. coli 157 bacteria. 
E. coli 157 was discovered in 1982, and now, on average, is responsible for 
some 20,000 infections and 200 deaths per year in the United States. Today, 
infection from E. coli 157 is the single greatest cause of kidney failure in 
children.

The origin of the recent outbreak is thought to be cattle that are fed a 
grain-based diet—more precisely the manure they produce. As researchers at 
Cornell University discovered in 1998, cows that graze or eat hay, as nature 
intended, do not produce the pathogen in their stomach.

The real culprit, in this case, is corporate agriculture, which uses 
economies of scale to mass produce food. And while the consumer may benefit 
in the form of lower prices, America’s agricultural communities bear the 
brunt of this consolidation. Consider these statistics. According to the 
Department of Agriculture, in 2001, 5 percent of U.S. farms, both corporate 
and family, raised 54 percent of the nation’s beef and dairy cattle, hogs 
and poultry. Ten percent of farm owners received 63 percent of the $27 
billion in federal farm subsidies paid out in 2000. Between 1994 and 1996, 
about 25 percent of hog farmers, 10 percent of grain farmers and 10 percent 
of dairy farmers went out of business. Of the 50 poorest counties in the 
United States, all but one are rural and agriculturally dependent. The 
United States today has more people in prison than people farming. And, 
thanks to the war on drugs, more of those people in prison come from farm 
families, as crystal meth does to rural America what crack did to 
America’s inner cities.

Big concentrated farming operations also produce a lot of manure. Each year, 
factory farms generate some 500 million tons of manure. That waste is held 
in lagoons and then applied to fields from which it runs off into streams or 
seeps into underground water supplies, polluting the water with viruses, 
bacteria, pesticides, antibiotics, hormones and fertilizers.

Abby Rockefeller, a leading critic of the sewage industry and a proponent of 
human-scale agriculture, says factory farming has given manure, once a 
staple of agriculture, a bad name. “The excreta of factory farm animals, 
produced in vast quantities in the concentration pens and laced with 
antibiotics to combat the disease created in these horrific conditions, is 
indeed rightly called 'waste'. Stored in massive lagoons and stinking not of 
manure but of putrefaction, too repulsive to use, it has become a liability 
to the water, not a source of fertility that manure has always been.

One of the defining aspects of corporate capitalism is its uncanny ability 
to profit from adversity. E. coli 157-contaminated spinach presents such an 
opportunity.

Into the breach stepped the nation's sewage treatment industry, which wants 
to treat manure the same way it does municipal sewage. In the early ’90s, 
the industry convinced the Environmental Protection Agency to reclassify the 
sludge produced by nation's sewer plants as a fertilizer to be spread across 
the land. To better sell this idea to the public, the sludge industry hired 
a PR firm, which invented the term 'biosolids'.This attempt at linguistic 
detoxification succeeded. Today 'biosolids' can be found in the 
Merriam-Webster dictionary.

So, where others see a mountain of E-coli 157 contaminated, factory farm cow 
shit, the sludge industry—which lobbies under the National Biosolids 
Partnership (a joint venture of the National Association of Clean Water 
Agencies, the Water Environment Federation and EPA)—sees opportunity: Tons 
upon tons of cattle feces waiting to be processed.

Representatives of the sewage treatment industry began calling for manure to 
be transformed into biosolids. Alan Rubin, the godfather of biosolids during 
his tenure at the EPA, lobbied the prominent environmental group National 
Resources Defense Council, praising the virtues of waste treatment as a 
solution to E-coli 157.

On September 26, Rubin sent 'smoking gun' information on E. coli to Melanie 
Shepherdson, an NRDC staff attorney, via an e-mail obtained by In These 
Times. She replied 'Thanks for this Al. We put out a press release today 
related to the E. coli outbreak and I am meeting with the EPA [Office of 
Science and Technology] folks this afternoon  and I plan to tie in the E. 
coli outbreak.'

That press release, issued jointly by the Sierra Club, the Environmental 
Integrity Project and the NRDC, parroted the sludge industry line: There are 
technologies available today that can reduce those pathogens by more than 99 
percent. The technology Sheperdson was referring to is the one that creates 
biosolid fertilizer out of municipal sewage sludge.

Rubin was ecstatic. He sent Maureen Reilly, a leader of the anti-sludge 
movement, a gloating e-mail: 'THE RIGHT MATERIAL IS FINALLY GOING TO BE 
REGULATED!!!! Life is good!!!'

Of course the biosolid industry has a public perception problem. Who wants 
to eat food fertilized by everything that we put down the sewer? As the 
Sierra Club described them back in 2002, 'Urban sludges are a highly 
complex, unpredictable biologically active mixture of organic material and 
human pathogens that contain thousands of industrial waste products, 
including dozens of carcinogens, hormone disrupting chemicals, toxic metals, 
dioxins, radionuclides and other persistent bioaccumulative poisons.'

In Monterey County, where the E. coli 157 contaminated spinach was grown, 
treated sewage water (the liquid remaining once sewage is turned into 
biosolids) from the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency (a nice 
name for a sewage treatment plant) is used to irrigate 12,000 acres of 
Monterey vegetable fields.

The industry claims that what it calls 'recycled water' is free from 
pathogens. And Monterey Regional General Manager Keith Israel says E. coli 
157 has never been found in the treatment plant's wastewater. (Sludgewatch 
Admin: have they ever tested for it?) Up in Seattle, public health 
authorities are more realistic, but just as dismissive. According to the 
King County Public Health Web site: “Recycled biosolids may contain E. 
coli bacteria, but most strains of these bacteria do not cause disease. ' 
Since [E. coli 157] is rare, only very tiny amounts of this strain would 
ever make it to sewage treatment plants.' (Admin: but common cow 
manure...which enteres the treatment plant through packing plants and 
slaughterhouse septage).

However, sewage treatment plants fail. And cattle manure enters municipal 
sewer systems in a variety of ways. While it is not known whether the fields 
from which the contaminated spinach came were among the 12,000 irrigated 
with Monterey's treated sewage water, E-coli 157 contamination from such a 
source is not out of the question.

In an October 14 story titled 'E. Coli's Spread Is Still A Mystery', the Los 
Angeles Times quoted Alejandro Castillo, a Texas A&M professor of food 
microbiology, as saying he thought it likely that something, such as the 
irrigation system, magnified the effects spreading the E.coli 157 from 
spinach leaf to spinach leaf.

In the end, Corporate America provides us with our choice of poison: 
Municipal sewage sludge or shit from factory farms.

Lost in the debate is the fact that the real solution lies in going back to 
a more nature-friendly, human-scale form of agriculture. The kind of 
agriculture that can support rural communities and provide healthy food for 
your table. But, hey, where is the corporate profit in that?

Joel Bleifuss is the editor of In These Times, where he has worked as an 
investigative reporter, columnist and editor since 1986. Bleifuss has had 
more stories on Project Censored's annual list of the 10 Most Censored 
Stories than any other journalist.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2893/November 23, 2006
The E. coli Free Market
By Joel Bleifuss

Workers at a Earthbound Organic Farm/Natural Selection Foods farm in San 
Juan Bautista, Calif.

Since the advent of giant industrial enterprises in the late 19th century, 
corporate capitalism in the United States has been defined by its use of 
economies of scale to increase profits—profits further enhanced by the 
die-off of those businesses unable to compete.

Today, vast corporate enterprises—protected by a legal system that defines 
corporations as persons endowed with the same constitutional rights as 
flesh-and-blood people—control whole sectors of the U.S. economy, the 
three branches of government and the Fourth Estate (the mass media through 
which the public gets its information). The end result: an interconnected, 
self-reinforcing system of political power—Corporate America—that 
operates outside human control. (Of course, the machine is oiled by a class 
in thrall to their six, seven and eight figure paychecks.)

Concerns about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness aside, the problem 
with this system is that it is, ultimately, unsustainable. Not only does 
this corporate behemoth chew up and spit out the people it employs as wage 
slaves, it gorges on resources of the natural world, disrupting the balance 
of life on Earth.

And when humans fuck with Mother Nature, she extracts revenge. Look no 
further than the Arctic’s drowning polar bears or the Sahara’s creeping 
deserts.

One could also look closer to home, to the 199 people fell who ill and the 
three who died after eating spinach contaminated with E. coli 157 bacteria. 
E. coli 157 was discovered in 1982, and now, on average, is responsible for 
some 20,000 infections and 200 deaths per year in the United States. Today, 
infection from E. coli 157 is the single greatest cause of kidney failure in 
children.

The origin of the recent outbreak is thought to be cattle that are fed a 
grain-based diet—more precisely the manure they produce. As researchers at 
Cornell University discovered in 1998, cows that graze or eat hay, as nature 
intended, do not produce the pathogen in their stomach.

The real culprit, in this case, is corporate agriculture, which uses 
economies of scale to mass produce food. And while the consumer may benefit 
in the form of lower prices, America’s agricultural communities bear the 
brunt of this consolidation. Consider these statistics. According to the 
Department of Agriculture, in 2001, 5 percent of U.S. farms, both corporate 
and family, raised 54 percent of the nation’s beef and dairy cattle, hogs 
and poultry. Ten percent of farm owners received 63 percent of the $27 
billion in federal farm subsidies paid out in 2000. Between 1994 and 1996, 
about 25 percent of hog farmers, 10 percent of grain farmers and 10 percent 
of dairy farmers went out of business. Of the 50 poorest counties in the 
United States, all but one are rural and agriculturally dependent. The 
United States today has more people in prison than people farming. And, 
thanks to the war on drugs, more of those people in prison come from farm 
families, as crystal meth does to rural America what crack did to 
America’s inner cities.

Big concentrated farming operations also produce a lot of manure. Each year, 
factory farms generate some 500 million tons of manure. That waste is held 
in lagoons and then applied to fields from which it runs off into streams or 
seeps into underground water supplies, polluting the water with viruses, 
bacteria, pesticides, antibiotics, hormones and fertilizers.

Abby Rockefeller, a leading critic of the sewage industry and a proponent of 
human-scale agriculture, says factory farming has given manure, once a 
staple of agriculture, a bad name. “The excreta of factory farm animals, 
produced in vast quantities in the concentration pens and laced with 
antibiotics to combat the disease created in these horrific conditions, is 
indeed rightly called ‘waste.’ Stored in massive lagoons and stinking 
not of manure but of putrefaction, too repulsive to use, it has become a 
liability to the water, not a source of fertility that manure has always 
been.”

One of the defining aspects of corporate capitalism is its uncanny ability 
to profit from adversity. E. coli 157-contaminated spinach presents such an 
opportunity.

Into the breach stepped the nation’s sewage treatment industry, which 
wants to treat manure the same way it does municipal sewage. In the early 
’90s, the industry convinced the Environmental Protection Agency to 
reclassify the sludge produced by nation’s sewer plants as a fertilizer to 
be spread across the land. To better sell this idea to the public, the 
sludge industry hired a PR firm, which invented the term “biosolids.” 
This attempt at linguistic detoxification succeeded. Today “biosolids” 
can be found in the Merriam-Webster dictionary.

So, where others see a mountain of E-coli 157 contaminated, factory farm cow 
shit, the sludge industry—which lobbies under the National Biosolids 
Partnership (a joint venture of the National Association of Clean Water 
Agencies, the Water Environment Federation and EPA)—sees opportunity: Tons 
upon tons of cattle feces waiting to be processed.

Representatives of the sewage treatment industry began calling for manure to 
be transformed into biosolids. Alan Rubin, the godfather of biosolids during 
his tenure at the EPA, lobbied the prominent environmental group National 
Resources Defense Council, praising the virtues of waste treatment as a 
solution to E-coli 157.

On September 26, Rubin sent “smoking gun” information on E. coli to 
Melanie Shepherdson, an NRDC staff attorney, via an e-mail obtained by In 
These Times. She replied, “Thanks for this Al. We put out a press release 
today related to the E. coli outbreak and I am meeting with the EPA [Office 
of Science and Technology] folks this afternoon … and I plan to tie in the 
E. coli outbreak.”

That press release, issued jointly by the Sierra Club, the Environmental 
Integrity Project and the NRDC, parroted the sludge industry line: “There 
are technologies available today that can reduce those pathogens by more 
than 99 percent.” The technology Sheperdson was referring to is the one 
that creates biosolid fertilizer out of municipal sewage sludge.

Rubin was ecstatic. He sent Maureen Reilly, a leader of the anti-sludge 
movement, a gloating e-mail: “THE RIGHT MATERIAL IS FINALLY GOING TO BE 
REGULATED!!!! Life is good!!!”

Of course the biosolid industry has a public perception problem. Who wants 
to eat food fertilized by everything that we put down the sewer? As the 
Sierra Club described them back in 2002, “Urban sludges are a highly 
complex, unpredictable biologically active mixture of organic material and 
human pathogens that contain thousands of industrial waste products, 
including dozens of carcinogens, hormone disrupting chemicals, toxic metals, 
dioxins, radionuclides and other persistent bioaccumulative poisons.”

In Monterey County, where the E. coli 157 contaminated spinach was grown, 
treated sewage water (the liquid remaining once sewage is turned into 
biosolids) from the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency (a nice 
name for a sewage treatment plant) is used to irrigate 12,000 acres of 
Monterey vegetable fields.

The industry claims that what it calls “recycled water” is free from 
pathogens. And Monterey Regional’s General Manager Keith Israel says E. 
coli 157 has never been found in the treatment plant’s wastewater. Up in 
Seattle, public health authorities are more realistic, but just as 
dismissive. According to the King County Public Health Web site: “Recycled 
biosolids may contain E. coli bacteria, but most strains of these bacteria 
do not cause disease. … Since [E. coli 157] is rare, only very tiny 
amounts of this strain would ever make it to sewage treatment plants.”

However, sewage treatment plants fail. And cattle manure enters municipal 
sewer systems in a variety of ways. While it is not known whether the fields 
from which the contaminated spinach came were among the 12,000 irrigated 
with Monterey’s treated sewage water, E-coli 157 contamination from such a 
source is not out of the question.

In an October 14 story titled “E. Coli’s Spread Is Still A Mystery,” 
the Los Angeles Times quoted Alejandro Castillo, a Texas A&M professor of 
food microbiology, as saying he thought it likely that something, such as 
the irrigation system, magnified the effects spreading the E.coli 157 from 
spinach leaf to spinach leaf.

In the end, Corporate America provides us with our choice of poison: 
Municipal sewage sludge or shit from factory farms.

Lost in the debate is the fact that the real solution lies in going back to 
a more nature-friendly, human-scale form of agriculture. The kind of 
agriculture that can support rural communities and provide healthy food for 
your table. But, hey, where is the corporate profit in that?

Joel Bleifuss is the editor of In These Times, where he has worked as an 
investigative reporter, columnist and editor since 1986. Bleifuss has had 
more stories on Project Censored's annual list of the 10 Most Censored 
Stories than any other journalist.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/2893/





More information about the Sludgewatch-l mailing list