Sludge Watch ==> Big reno at NY biolab fuels speculation about Plum Island
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Mon Sep 4 12:42:42 EDT 2006
Sludgewatch Admin
America is expanding its biolabs - where experiments with anthrax, viruses,
and animal diseases take place in top secret. If we are worried about the
environmental fate of municipal sewage treatment plant solids, spills and
effluent, there is reason to have real concerns about the safety of the
wastewater and solids disposal from these facilities. This story in the
Scientist says Plum Island needs $30M just to maintain safety.
There are several other biolabs being build around the USA. See further
stories below.
..........................................
By John Dudley Miller
NEWS
Big renovations at NY biolab
$30 million expansion and upgrade fuels speculation about how long aging
Plum Island facility will stay open
THE SCIENTIST
Published 27th June 2006
The Plum Island Animal Disease Center in New York will receive a $30 million
expansion and upgrade, despite the fact that the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) has said it might shut the lab down when a new facility goes
into operation in 2013.
Planned improvements to the 55-year-old facility will include a new 8,000
square feet animal wing, a conversion of 2,500 existing square feet to new
BSL-3 space, and a new firehouse/motor pool building. Upgrades will
modernize the water system, the electrical system, the cold-water chillers,
and the wastewater decontamination system. In December 2002 the Center lost
power for three hours when its backup generators failed.
DHS spokesman Chris Kelly told The Scientist that DHS requested the Plum
Island improvements in 2003, just after it assumed control of the facility,
formerly overseen by the Department of Agriculture. The decision to spend
this money “is completely separate” from the Department’s
decision build a new $451 million, 500,000 square feet National Bio- and
Agro Defense Facility (NBAF), he said, and there has been no decision
regarding whether to keep Plum Island open along with the NBAF.
“Until the NBAF is fully operational, Kelly said, Plum Island
“will continue its important mission by educating veterinarians about
foreign animal diseases and continuing to develop novel diagnostic
techniques and preventatives.”
Jon Schneider, press secretary to Congressman Tim Bishop, whose district
includes Plum Island, told The Scientist that Bishop has asked DHS Secretary
Chertoff to keep Plum Island open. “We received no assurances about the
future of Plum Island.”
Alan Pearson, a former DHS advisor now with the Center for Arms Control and
Non-Proliferation, said that although he doesn’t know DHS’ plans,
“In my opinion, this notice means that DHS is keeping its options open
with regard to the future of the Plum Island facility after NBAF comes on
line.”
Harley Moon, a former Plum Island director, said $30 million in improvements
might be needed just to keep research at Plum Island safe. “It’s a
horrendous cost, I know,” he said, “but we’re stuck with Plum
Island right now, and that’s the cost of doing business.”
Regarding the NBAF, the DHS has received 29 applications from 22 states and
the District of Columbia, Kelly said. “At some point in the coming
weeks a select list of applicants will be announced,” he said.
John Dudley Miller
jmiller at the-scientist.com
Links within this article
Department of Homeland Security Plum Island Animal Disease Center Fact Sheet
www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/press_release/press_release_0176.xml
“A-E Services for programming & design of integrated facility
improvements at the Plum Island Animal Disease Center,” Federal
Business Opportunities, June 9, 2006.
www.fbo.gov/spg/DHS/FLETC/FLETCBPB/LGL06R00012/SynopsisR.html
Department of Homeland Security Plum Island FAQs, Question 36
www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/interapp/editorial/editorial_0808.xml
Government Accountability Office, "Combating bioterrorism: Actions need to
improve security at Plum Island Animal Disease Center," GAO report number
GAO-03-847, October 20, 2003
www.gao.gov/htext/d03847.html
J.D. Miller, “US homeland security to build animal biolab,” The
Scientist, February 6, 2006
www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23091/
“Congressman Bishop, Senator Clinton discuss Plum Island’s future
with Homeland Security Secretary Chertoff,” October 6, 2005
wwwc.house.gov/timbishop/r109-051.htm
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
www.armscontrolcenter.org/cbw
Harley Moon
www.vetmed.iastate.edu/faculty_staff/profiles/hwmoon.asp
J.D. Miller, “More applicants for US bio-agro lab,” The Scientist,
May 17, 2006
http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23454/
................................................
http://www.trivalleycares.org/news/articledisplay.asp?artid=384
Thursday, August 10, 2006
Bioterror
By: Eric Firpo
Published In: Tracy Press
A bomb test site in the hills upwind of Tracy has made the short list of
18 spots where a research laboratory might be built to help protect against
bioterrorism, the Department of Homeland Security announced Wednesday.
Homeland Security is looking for a spot to build a 500,000-square-foot
research lab to replace a similar, but antiquated, laboratory at Plum Island
in New York, which was built in the 1950s.
The University of California asked to run the new lab at Site 300, 7,000
acres in the hills west of Tracy thats part of the Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory.
Homeland Security said the UC has made the first cut, along with 17 other
applicants in 11 states. It might not be built for another eight years
environmental studies must be done for each applicant, and the federal
government this year allotted $23 million to study where the lab will be
placed.
Lab spokeswoman Susan Houghton said the new research lab would be a
job-creating boon to the region and a scientific prize for the nation.
Houghton said the aim of the new lab is to find ways to counter diseases
such as foot-and-mouth disease that affect animals, and those such as the
avian flu that can also infect people.
This is considered a very prestigious lab to have, she said.
But not by everyone.
Now that Site 300 has cleared its first hurdle, the anti-nuclear group
Tri-Valley CAREs is launching an effort to prevent it from being built west
of Tracy.
The group fears the new lab will research bioweapons, since it will have
Level 3 and Level 4 labs. A Level 3 lab is built to study potentially deadly
diseases, and Level 4 labs are built to handle deadly illnesses that have no
known cures.
Tri-Valleys director, Marylia Kelley, said the group was irked when the UC
turned down its public records request to view a copy of its application.
They didnt even give us the cover letter, she said.
The group is worried what would happen if an airborne animal disease somehow
escaped the new lab and infected dairy cattle here or worse, people.
Tracy Hills, a proposed development of several thousand homes and
businesses, will sit less than a mile from Site 300s border.
Parts of Site 300 are so polluted with toxic chemicals and metals it made it
on the federal list of Superfund sites, the most contaminated in the
country.
A major accident could devastate the state economy, Kelley stated.
The group says a nuclear laboratory is no place for a biological laboratory
because it sends a message that the lab will be used to develop offensive
bioagents instead of trying to defend against them.
Kelley claims the new lab will experiment with a lot of potential
bioweapons agents.
She also argues it will violate an anti-bioweapons treaty which allows for
unannounced inspections.
You dont show up and do a surprise inspection at a nuclear weapons lab,
she said.
But talk of bioweapons infuriates people at Lawrence Livermores lab.
Theyre calling it biowarfare, Houghton said. They use phrases that scare
people. Theyre trying to get sexy headlines. We believe we can bring
scientific technology that will help the area and help the nation. We will
not be creating weapons. We will not be doing anything related to weapons.
Period.
Tri-Valley CAREs has scheduled a meeting at 7 p.m. Sept. 12 at 501 W. Grant
Line Road where panelists critical of the proposal will discuss the lab.
The Department of Homeland Security has said they will take community
acceptance into account, Kelley said. What that means is if the community
of Tracy becomes public in their objections, the Department of Homeland
Security may not chose Tracy.
To contact City Editor Eric Firpo, call 830-4223 or e-mail
efirpo at tracypress.com.
..................................................................
Utah bioterror labs expandanother warning for Boston Document Actions
Last modified 2006-03-30 23:24
Over at the U.S. Armys Dugway Proving Grounds
procurement officers quietly
placed orders
for four fermentors with a total capacity of producing
nearly 3,500 liters of bacteria and the possibility of another five
fermentors in the future.
Over at the U.S. Armys Dugway Proving Grounds
procurement officers quietly
placed orders
for four fermentors with a total capacity of producing
nearly 3,500 liters of bacteria and the possibility of another five
fermentors in the future.
Edward Hammond, who keeps an eye on bioweapons research from his Texas-based
Sunshine Project, said, A few years ago, if somebody did that it would be
viewed as possibly a smoking gun of an offensive program. It would probably
get the Iranians bombed if they did that at one of their facilities.
One chilling, unexplained request from Dugway last year asked for batches of
dead, frozen sheep for testing a mobile cremator-ium, resurrecting the
specter of 6,000 sheep found dead in Utahs Skull Valley following the
accidental release of VX [nerve gas] from Dugway in 1968. Some worry the
likelihood of accidents will increase as more tests are performed at a
supposedly secure Army base where nine illegal workers from Mexico were
found working for a subcontractor in February, building a new hotel.
There is a very blurry line between offense and defense when it comes to
germ warfare, said Salt Lake City Dugway watchdog Steve Erickson, director
of the Citizens Education Project.
Critics say the problem is that such experiments look a lot like what a
country would do if it wanted to make biological weapons.
in writing up
plans for new biodefense centers being constructed this year, the Homeland
Security department suggested developing defensive biological weapons would
be OK. Thats a position taken by no other country
.
Just Testing: Is the US Government making anthrax bombs in Utah? Ted
McDonough, Salt Lake Weekly 2/23/06
More information about the Sludgewatch-l
mailing list