Sludge Watch ==> Pennsylvania - Industrial sludge - threatens groundwater
Maureen Reilly
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Mon Apr 30 16:15:42 EDT 2007
http://www.pottstownmercury.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=18276457&BRD=1674&PAG=461&dept_id=18041&rfi=6
Local group: Remove polluted lagoon sludge
Evan Brandt, ebrandt at pottsmerc.com
04/29/2007
LOWER POTTSGROVE -- Its not just the contaminated water below ground that
is a concern at the former Occidental Chemical plant.
Of equal concern to Hank Cole and his clients, the Alliance for a Clean
Environment, is the fact that open pools of sludge polluted with such
chemicals as TCE, PVC and dioxin could be washed out in the next big flood.
When the Schuylkill topped its banks last June, the waters came dangerously
close to washing the toxic waste into Philadelphias water supply, Cole
said.
The latest feasibility study of the unlined lagoons by OxyChems consultant
examines several options for cleaning the mess, which was first ordered in
1993. Options include removing the material and contaminated soil to a
Canadian landfill, building a new landfill to hold the material at a
location at the site that is not in the Schuylkill River flood plain and
covering the lagoons over and making them into a landfill, which would
require somehow protecting the area from flood waters.
Removing the 32,000 gallons of sludge and contaminated soil is the only safe
option, ACE argues.
Coles analysis of the consultants study notes that the floodwaters that
washed over the area last June lapped at the dirt berms that hold the waste
sludge. The berms "showed some signs of erosion" and an inspection on Aug.
8, 2006, "revealed an area of PVC on the flood plain" and it is "quite
possible that the material was carried from one of the lagoons to the flood
plain by flood waters," Cole wrote.
Given how close that call was, the river and the more than 1 million
Americans who depend on it for drinking water may suffer the consequences of
leaving the material there for the next flood, he said.
It is no longer responsible or protective of human health and the
environment to delay cleaning out the lagoons, argued ACE vice president
Donna Cuthbert.
In an April 25 letter to Kathleen McGinty, secretary of the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection, ACE wrote, "We would like you to
help us convince EPA to conduct or require Occidental to conduct an
immediate removal action, including excavation of the earthen lagoon wastes
and disposal in a secure off-site landfill."
Glen Springs prefers the option in which the material would be buried on the
site because that would relieve the company of meeting "landfill disposal
restrictions" that would be imposed at off-site landfills, Cole wrote.
"In other words, Occidental saves money by taking advantage of a loophole,
at the expense of community protection," Cole wrote.
That option also would make redevelopment of the site difficult for anything
but another industrial client, an option not likely to materialize under
current economic conditions, thus relegating the site to remaining a
polluted "brownfield" into the foreseeable future, Cole argued.
"In light of the recent flooding event, Glen Springs/Occidentals listing of
flood plain disposal demonstrates either a disconnect to reality or a total
disregard for the environment," Cole wrote.
Cole also wrote that one option being considered, to "recycle" the material,
would be more hazardous.
OxyChems previous attempts to recycle the waste by drying it in order to
retrieve the usable PVC was unsuccessful. More than once, the waste caught
fire and created dioxin, a byproduct of burning PVC.
Helpful Links
Pa. Department of Environmental Protection
www.depweb.state.pa.us/
Environmental Protection Agency
www.epa.gov/
Alliance for a Clean Environment
http://www.acereport.org/
Glen Springs Holding Co.
www.glennsprings-copperbasinproject.com/about.htm
More information about the Sludgewatch-l
mailing list