Sludge Watch ==> Groups appeal Ontario waste incineration permit at Lafarge cement kiln
Maureen Reilly
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Tue Jan 9 12:25:08 EST 2007
Sludgewatch Admin:
The Ontario government has taken up some very nasty environmental stances.
They are promoting and continuing the most toxic forms of incineration while
slowing down the implementation of newer proposed biomass technologies.
For instance they have extended the permits on dirty coal burning energy,
given the Lafarge Bath cement plant (a plant with no air scrubbers and that
emits mercury) the opportunity to burn waste, tires, muncipal trash and
animal rendering plant wastes. This bad decision is now being appealed. see
below
Why would the Liberals allow the worst kind of incineration and hamper the
importation of the best European technologies?
...................................................................
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
www.waterkeeper.ca
Groups appeal Ontario's approval of waste incineration at Lafarge cement
kiln
On Friday, lawyers representing Loyalist Township residents, local
landowners, Lake Ontario Waterkeeper, and Trustee of Lake Ontario Gord
Downie applied to the Environmental Review Tribunal for leave (permission)
to appeal two environmental approvals issued to Lafarge Canada Inc.
The approvals, issued two weeks ago by the Ministry of the Environment,
permit Lafarge to collect, store and burn various wastes - including scrap
tires, plastics, and meat and bone meal wastes - as "alternative fuels" at
its cement manufacturing plant at Bath, Ontario.
"The Ministry's issuance of the two approvals is unreasonable and could
cause significant environmental harm," stated Robert Wright, senior counsel
with Sierra Legal, which represents a local residents' coalition. "Our
independent experts have concluded that the proposal will pose serious risks
to the environment and human health, particularly in relation to airborne
contaminants."
"No facilities in Ontario currently burn tires, and the Ministry has
conceded that it has no experience monitoring the environmental performance
of tire-burning facilities," said Joe Castrilli, an environmental lawyer
representing local landowners. "Since the Ministry has recently proposed a
province-wide ban on tire-burning in Ontario, it is unreasonable to use
local residents as guinea pigs in this ill-conceived experiment. "
"To date, the Ministry has refused to require Lafarge to prepare an
environmental assessment under the Environmental Assessment Act, and has
issued the approvals without public hearings under the Environmental
Protection Act," declared Richard Lindgren, counsel with the Canadian
Environmental Law Association (CELA), which represents Lake Ontario
Waterkeeper and Gord Downie. "Therefore, seeking leave to appeal under the
Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) represents the last chance for this
proposal to be scrutinized in public hearings be fore the Environmental
Review Tribunal".
It is anticipated that the Tribunal's decision on the EBR leave application
may be made in approximately 30 days.
More information about the Sludgewatch-l
mailing list