Sludge Watch ==> Venture / Santa Paula get it wrong - ONLY LAND APPLICATION BANNED IN KERN
Maureen Reilly
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Fri Jul 27 12:41:39 EDT 2007
Sludgewatch Admin:
The Ventura Star got it wrong
The Santa Paula Times got it wrong.
Both papers state that Kern County has banned the importation of sewage
sludge.
Kern County has not banned imported sludge.
They banned THE LAND APPLICATION OF SEWAGE SLUDGE.
Sludges can still be brought into Kern for processing, landfilling, etc.
Here is the wording of the Kern ordinance:
http://keepkernclean.com/Sludge_Initiative_Measure.pdf
...........................
Ventura County Supervisors to consider Toland Landfill sewer sludge
operation
By Peggy Kelly
Santa Paula News
Published: July 20, 2007
The Ventura County Board of Supervisors will hear an appeal from area
ranchers and farmers on the Planning Commissions denial of their request
that the proposed project to process sludge at the Toland Road Landfill be
studied further or denied.
By Peggy Kelly
Santa Paula Times
The Ventura County Board of Supervisors will hear an appeal from area
ranchers and farmers on the Planning Commissions denial of their request
that the proposed project to process sludge at the Toland Road Landfill be
studied further or denied. The Supervisors will consider the appeal on July
24 at 1:30 p.m. at the Ventura County Government Center, 800 S. Victoria
Ave., Ventura.
During the day-long Planning Commission hearing held June 28, a county
planner told commissioners that the key to the project is that its a
local solution to a local problem, after Kern County voters last year
banned the importation of sludge.
The ban takes effect in August 2008, said county Planner Scott Ellison, and
At that point Ventura County will not have a good place to dispose of their
biosolids... we have been exporting our sewage sludge and making it their
problem. In response, Ellison noted, the Ventura Regional Sanitation
District decided to come up with a local solution.
That local solution is now potentially the Santa Clara River Valleys
problem, said area rancher Gordon Kimball who testified at the hearing.
Santa Paula and Fillmore residents, as well as Santa Clara School
administrators and parents, attended the hearing for the Minor Modification
of the existing CUP issued to the VRSD in the mid-1990s to expand landfill
operations.
VRSD Attorney Mark Zirbel told commissioners that the proposed project would
have a very small working face at the landfill. As an example, he noted
that 80 tons of 20 percent solids, 80 percent water sewage sludge would be
cooked down to 20 tons that would used as cover on a very small portion
of the landfill... the next day its buried forever.
The project - up to four dryer units that would operate 24/7, and 15
electric turbines - would be fully regulated, there would be no runoff of
water... my engineering staff knows what they are doing. According to the
VRSD mitigation report, up to 7,000 tons of sewer sludge a month will be
taken to the Toland Landfill, located mid-way between Santa Paula and
Fillmore.
Kimball told commissioners that The Toland Group appealed because we have
serious concerns that led to approval, and that the group was astonished
at the vagueness of much of the application. The VRSD conducted their own
study and adopted the results, but there is not an Environmental Impact
Review for this project.... We believe it is the responsibility of the
county planning department to be responsible and ensure that the permit is
clear, concise and enforceable. Just because the (document) says there
wont be impacts does not mean there wont be.
Kimball said an example is the mandated truck monitoring during blackout
traffic periods - created due to concerns of Santa Clara School impacts -
conducted by the VRSD. We see people from the landfill monitoring as trucks
make turns that are banned. Documentation notes monitoring requirements,
but there is absolutely no mention of enforcement, and a condition without
enforcement is not a condition.
Also an issue is the ban on importation of sludge from out of county that a
permit condition does not make explicit, said Kimball. Language is also
missing to enforce limitations on the tons of sludge processed per day, as
well as to hold sludge to Class A standards.
The applicant always referred to this as a drying process, showed us dry
pellets that were feather-like and completely dry... imagine our surprise
that approximately 25 percent water will be taken to the refuse column, the
first time the issue had been mentioned in 18 months of discussions.
Subsequently, the amount of water to receive post-treatment is not defined,
Kimball added.
Truck traffic, and measures that will control, not the same as eliminate,
odors, are not addressed fully in the permit. Why is this not clear and
definitive? A previous comment that throughout the state wastewater
treatment plants operate next to agricultural lands is true, said Kimball,
but also true are recent problems with contaminated crops.
Deanne Hobson, who serves on the Santa Clara School Board of Trustees, said
that truck traffic blackout periods imposed by the VRSD have been ignored,
and that there are no provisions for a similar blackout during kindergarten
pickup periods.
Rancher Carol Hardison noted that wet sewer sludge contains pathogens, and
that she has learned that the testing of Toland Landfill air and water
quality is done at a Piru area station. They might be able to do it locally
so well know what the real results are, Hardison said.
Information about Santa Ana and other winds is false, said rancher Ken
Chapman, who operates a weather station used by government agencies. There
are three modes of transport for pollutants - water, aerosol and fugitive
dust. I tell you a 60 mph wind will transport a significant amount of
fugitive dust such as from dried sludge, which contains 70 percent
pathogens including those not detectable but highly dangerous. Chapman also
questioned the source of sludge, noting that the annual tonnage projections
provided by the VRSD are high above the tonnage created in the county.
http://www.santapaulatimes.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/14140/Ventura_County_Supervisors_to_consider_Toland_Landfill_sewer_sludge_operation.html
More information about the Sludgewatch-l
mailing list