Sludge Watch ==> USDA may relax some organic food standards
Maureen Reilly
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Mon Jun 11 14:10:09 EDT 2007
Sludgewatch Admin:
AND...why is USDA allowing cattle grazed on sewage effluent irrigated
pasture to be considered 'organic'? Why are effluent irrigated crops fed to
dairy cows still open to certified organic milk?
This Salinas Valley interpretation of organic regs needs to be fixed.
..........................................................
Nonorganic exceptions ruffle enthusiasts of organic food
11.jun.07
New York Times
Andrew Martin
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/11/business/11organic.html?_r=1&oref=login
The U.S. Department of Agriculture, the final arbiter of all things organic,
is, according to this story, poised to approve a list of nonorganic
ingredients that can be used in food stamped with its green-and-white
organic seal.
The list includes hops for beer, dill weed oil for flavoring pickles, and
elderberry juice coloring for making foods bright red to blue purple. There
is also chia, an herb from Central America that is used in some baked goods,
and fructooligosaccharides, a bulking agent that adds fiber.
In all, the organic advisory board to the Agriculture Department recommended
that 38 nonorganic ingredients be added to a list of approved ingredients.
Rules on organic labeling dictate that 95 percent of a product must be
organic to obtain the departments label; the remaining 5 percent can be
nonorganic if it comes from an approved list.
To get on the approved list, an organic alternative to the ingredient must
not be commercially available.
But purists were cited as saying that this list of ingredients is the latest
example of big business trying to water down organic standards in an effort
to cash in on the increased demand for organic products and that the
nonorganic ingredients will weaken the integrity of the organic label.
Merrill A. Clark, an organic farmer from Michigan and a former member of the
organic advisory board, was quoted as saying in comments to the Agriculture
Department that, "More than 90 percent of the food/agricultural items on the
proposed list of materials in this rule are items that can easily be grown
organically," and that allowing such nonorganic ingredients are totally
unhealthy for the organic industry down the road, and are opening the
organic rules to ridicule and unflattering public exposure.
Jill M. Cataldo of Huntley, Ill., told the Agriculture Department that her
family ate only organic beef to avoid exposure to mad cow disease and other
health risks. But she questioned the integrity of organic sausage that would
be wrapped in nonorganic casings made from the intestines of animals that
can be fed such things as bovine growth hormones.
Officials at the Department of Agriculture could not be reached for comment
Sunday.
top
USDA may relax standards for organic foods
09.jun.07
Los Angeles Times
Scott J. Wilson
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-organic9jun09,0,1336066.story?coll=la-home-center
With the "USDA organic" seal stamped on its label, Anheuser-Busch, according
to this story, calls its Wild Hop Lager "the perfect organic experience."
The Wild Hop website was quoted as saying, "In today's world of artificial
flavors, preservatives and factory farming, knowing what goes into what you
eat and drink can just about drive you crazy. That's why we have decided to
go back to basics and do things the way they were meant to be
naturally."
But, the story says that many beer drinkers may not know that Anheuser-Busch
has the organic blessing from federal regulators even though Wild Hop Lager
uses hops grown with chemical fertilizers and sprayed with pesticides.
A deadline of midnight Friday to come up with a new list of nonorganic
ingredients allowed in USDA-certified organic products passed without action
from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, leaving uncertain whether some
foods currently labeled "USDA organic" would continue to be produced.
The agency is considering a list of 38 nonorganic ingredients that will be
permitted in organic foods. Because of the broad uses of these ingredients
as colorings and flavorings, for example almost any type of manufactured
organic food could be affected, including cereal, sausage, bread and beer.
Organic food advocates have fought to block approval of some or all of the
proposed ingredients, saying consumers would be misled.
Ronnie Cummins, executive director of the Organic Consumers Assn. of
Finland, Minn., a nonprofit group that boasts 850,000 members, was quoted as
saying, "This proposal is blatant catering to powerful industry players who
want the benefits of labeling their products 'USDA organic' without doing
the work to source organic materials."
USDA spokeswoman Joan Shaffer declined to comment on the plan.
Food manufacturers were cited as saying this week that they were hoping the
agency would approve the rules by Friday to continue labeling their products
as organic.
A federal judge had given the USDA until midnight Friday to name the
nonorganic ingredients it would allow in organic foods, but the agency did
not release its final list by the end of the day.
Cummins was quoted as saying, "They probably don't know what to do. On the
other hand, it's hard to believe they're going to make people change their
labels, although that's what they should do."
The story says that demand for organic food in the U.S. is booming as
consumers seek products that are more healthful and friendlier to the
environment. Sales have more than doubled in the last five years, reaching
$16.9 billion last year, according to the Organic Trade Assn. in Greenfield,
Mass., which represents small and large food producers.
But with big companies entering what was formerly a mom-and-pop industry,
new questions have arisen about what exactly goes into organic food. For
food to be called organic, it must be grown without chemical fertilizers and
pesticides. Animals must be raised without antibiotics and growth hormones
and given some access to the outdoors.
Many nonorganic ingredients, including hops, are already being used in
organic products, thanks to a USDA interpretation of the Organic Foods
Protection Act of 1990. In 2005, a federal judge disagreed with how the USDA
was applying the law and gave the agency two years to revise its rules.
Organic food supporters had hoped that the USDA would allow only a small
number of substances, but were dismayed last month when the agency released
the proposed list of 38 ingredients.
Carl Chamberlain, a research assistant with the Pesticide Education Project
in Raleigh, N.C., was quoted as saying, "Adding 38 new ingredients is not
just a concession by the USDA, it is a major blow to the organic movement in
the U.S. because it would erode consumer confidence in organic standards."
Under the agency's proposal, as much as 5% of a food product could be made
with these ingredients and still get the "USDA organic" seal. Hops, though a
major component of beer's flavor, are less than 5% of the final product
because the beverage is mostly water.
Sales of organic beer, though still a small portion of total beer sales,
have been growing even faster than overall organic food sales. They reached
$19 million in 2005, a 40% increase over the previous year (2006 figures are
not yet available).
Trying to get a share of the market for green products, Anheuser-Busch
introduced two organic beers in September, and soon pitched them in fliers
to wholesalers.
"Environmentally conscious consumers are looking for certified organic
products, including beer, the fastest-growing organic beverage," the pitch
said. "Capitalize on this growing market with Wild Hop Lager and Stone Mill
Pale Ale."
But while the two beers use 100% organic barley malt, less than 10% of the
hops they use is organic.
More information about the Sludgewatch-l
mailing list