Sludge Watch ==> Australia - alliance opposed to drinking recycled sewage effluent
Maureen Reilly
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Fri Mar 23 01:37:19 EDT 2007
Sludge Watch
The Food Safety Group at Kansas University have come out with a Tshirt with
the perfect slogan for our times: Don't Eat Poop.
I guess they need another one: Don't Drink Poop Either
But "Think Before You Drink" - the Aussie campaign slogan is great.
But sewage sludge and sewage effluent contains worse things than
poop...industrial chemcials, drugs, and hormone distrupting chemicals. It
makes no sense to drink sewage effluent.
Water conservation strategies need to be pursued. But as we see in this
story the wastewater industry is keen to force recycled water into the
drinking water aquifer. The same trend it heading into California and
Arizona. All the Aussie news stories were about the wastewater 'experts'
sniffing about 'scaremongering'. The contaminants in reclaimed water
certainly are an issue.
What to do instead?
Composting toilets would be a good start.... the zero flush toilet...and no
industrial contaminated poo.
.....................................................
Campaign countered
By Steven Wardill
March 20, 2007 11:00pm
A KEY expert has rejected claims in a new pamphlet linking recycled water to
liver cancer and feminisation of lambs and fish.
University of Queensland's Paul Greenfield yesterday said the 28-page
document had quoted numerous experts out of context, while other claims were
"rubbish".
The document is being distributed to 400,000 households around Brisbane by a
secret alliance of individuals and businesses opposed to adding recycled
water to drinking supplies.
Group spokesman Toowoomba councillor Snow Manners yesterday refused to name
those funding the document but said they included local food manufacturers.
Cr Manners said he expected criticism, but the document, which cost about
$300,000 to print and distribute, dispelled many of the myths about recycled
water's safety.
"There are no studies to say (recycled water) is safe," he said.
"Yet, there are an untold number of studies questioning the safety."
Cr Manners warned the group had gathered a war chest to spend on spreading
the truth about recycled water.
"We will throw another $1 million at it until politicians and the media
start telling the truth," he said.
The pamphlet quotes a 1996 study which found there was a 100 per cent
increase in liver cancer rates in areas using "reclaimed water".
It also quotes a 1998 British study linking sewage treatment chemicals to
male fish producing eggs and a finding by Scottish scientists showing male
lambs behaving like females after being fed sewage sludge pellets.
However, Professor Greenfield, who heads the Queensland Water Commission's
expert advisory panel, said the document either deliberately or mistakenly
confused the issues.
"I understand it is new and people are worried," Professor Greenfield said.
"But the arguments in this document are taken out of context.
"As a piece of science it is pretty rubbish."
Infrastructure Minister Anna Bligh said the document was littered with
inaccuracies.
"This is a document that is so riddled with misinformation the best thing
you can do with it is throw it in your recycled paper bin," she said.
Liberal leader Bruce Flegg said he believed recycled water could be
delivered safely but an informed debate about whether the State Government
could do this was essential.
.......................................
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=255986
More information about the Sludgewatch-l
mailing list