Sludge Watch ==> Farmers- Using Sewage Sludge Could Devalue Your Land
Maureen Reilly
maureen.reilly at sympatico.ca
Mon Feb 25 13:16:43 EST 2008
Steer Clear of Sewage Sludge
Itâs nutrient rich, itâs free â and it could devalue your land
by Donald R. Good*
Itâs a very common practice in Ontario to apply human sewage sludge to
farmland. I understand cities in other provinces also have mountains of this
stuff and are looking at farmland for disposal.
In eastern Ontario this practice has come under attack from concerned
neighbors of farmers receiving sludge. In July, I attended a public meeting
in Metcalf, a village south of Ottawa. This meeting was called by the
township to give concerned citizens a chance to voice their concerns.
The sludge in question comes from the Ottawa regional treatment plant. It is
class B sludge, meaning that 80% of the microorganisms are destroyed.
Citizens at the July meeting were most concerned about the other 20%.
The sludge is applied to farmland. Each field is evaluated and, if approved,
the farmer is granted a Certificate of Approval. This document is granted
only if the field meets very stringent criteria. The sludge also has to meet
specific safety criteria â for example, it cannot contain unsafe levels of
heavy toxic metals.
Sludge can be applied only to certain crops, mainly corn and hay. It cannot
be applied to crops such as strawberries. This raises the first major
concern. If sludge is not safe for strawberries, then at the time of
application it must be unsafe. The field retention time before corn or hay
are harvested is supposed to render it safe. This is basically what the
environment ministry official indicated at the meeting.
Representatives of the city, the medical officer of health, and the
environment and the agriculture ministries all heavily supported the
program. SO did representatives of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture and
Kemptville ag college. A local farmer who applies sludge on his land also
praised the program.
Human sewage sludge contains nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous as well as
some micronutrient. Crops need these nutrients to grow. Sewage sludge on
farmland is a source of nutrients and farmers get it free.
Should you apply sewage sludge to your farm? A number of farmers have asked
my legal advice on this question and I always say they should not. Hereâs
why:
If the application of sludge (often called biosolids) to farmland is a waste
disposal program, farmers should demand a tipping fee for the use of their
land as a waste disposal site. If the sewage sludge is a valuable fertilizer
product, the city should sell it to farmers for its nutrient value. In fact,
farmers should want to buy it. Why donât they?
The fact that sewage sludge has to be given away implies that it is
worthless. In other words, the nutrient value is offset by some other cost.
I believe this lack of value arises from the inherent risk of using material
contaminated with human diseases on farmland. Thatâs the offsetting cost.
There is your dilemma! The promoters of sludge-as-fertilizer call it a
valuable recycling program that is safe. On the other hand, sludge has no
value due to its inherent risk.
Several years ago, imported fresh fruit from South America caused a serious
bacteriological disease problem in Ontario. The fruit had apparently been
irrigated with human sewage sludge. Pathogenic bacteria survived and
contaminated the fruit. To this day, when I go to the market and pick up a
box of fruit and see the source as South America, I put it back. My
perception is that it may be contaminated.
Ultimately, clients of farmers are food consumers. As a farmer you should
never adopt a practice that undermines the confidence of consumers in the
safety of food you produce. The application of sewage sludge to farmland
does just that. On this basis alone, farmers should not apply human sewage
sludge to farmland.
The environmental questionnaire used by FCC and the big banks requires
would-be farm borrowers to disclose the application of sewage sludge or
industrial sludge. One major food or water contamination problem associate
with sewage sludge could be enough for farmers using it to have difficulty
with financing.
A prudent buyer of farmland should require a Phase I audit of any farm that
has had sewage sludge or industrial sludge applied on it.
Any farmer who still wants to use a sewage sludge application program should
demand an indemnity agreement from the applicator and the municipality. This
agreement should give you full indemnification if you run into claims,
damages or costs as a result of the program.
*Lawyer Donald R. Good was raised on a dairy farm in Waterloo County, Ont.
His practice is restricted to agriculture, food and environmental law. He
can be contacted at Box 5118, Merivale Depot, Nepean, Ont., K2C 3H4, phone
1-800-661-8837.
More information about the Sludgewatch-l
mailing list