<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>Dear friends and colleagues,<BR><BR>It has been a busy and eventful five
years since the Women's Caucus for Gender Justice was formed in 1997 to advocate
for a gender perspective in the negotiations toward the International
Criminal Court.<BR><BR>Through the advocacy of so many women, the Rome Statute
stands as the most significant example of gender mainstreaming in an
international treaty. The evidence of this is by now obvious to many - the
explicit inclusion of rape and other crimes of sexual and gender violence as war
crimes and crimes against humanity, an array of measures intended to ensure a
more empowered participation and appropriate protection of victims and witnesses
as well as provisions to help ensure a presence of women on the Court and gender
experts among staff.<BR><BR>The advocacy continued after the Rome Statute into
the negotiation of supplemental texts from early 1999 through mid-2002 where
definitions of crimes were debated as well as rules of procedure and evidence
among. The Women's Caucus was present at this phase too, advocating for
progressive and non-discriminatory definitions of rape and other crimes of
sexual and gender violence as well as appropriate rules of evidence for the
trial of crimes of sexual violence. <BR><BR>Last year saw several key events
that signaled the end of one phase of the establishment of the world's first
permanent criminal court and the beginning of a new and exciting era. With the
60th ratification on 11 April 2002, the Rome Statute entered into force on 1
July 2002, marking the moment at which the Court's jurisdiction officially took
effect. In September, the nomination period for judges was opened and then
closed in November with 45 candidates, 10 of whom were women.<BR><BR>This year
has proved to be no less eventful. The election of the Court's first 18 judges
was held in February during which seven women were elected. Though the Women's
Caucus had advocated all along for parity, the election of seven women was a
historic achievement in light of the traditionally very low number of women
serving in international tribunals.<BR><BR>The nomination and election of the
judges was also significant for the way that NGO's at the national and
international level worked together in an effort to help ensure the nomination
and election of the most qualified candidates and a diverse court. Women's
groups in particular worked to ensure their governments followed the appropriate
procedures for the nomination of candidates, advocated for the nomination of
qualified female candidates and spoke out if their governments failed to measure
up to the standards set by the Rome Statute. Some took great risks in doing
so. It was inspiring and exciting to see so many come together again in
different ways to have such an important and historic impact.<BR><BR>On 11 March
2003, the inaugural session of the Court was held in The Hague, the Netherlands
at which time the judges were sworn into office. And this week, the Assembly of
States Parties selected the Chief Prosecutor, Mr. Luis Moreno Ocampo of
Argentina. <BR><BR>Now that the Court is officially opened, it is time to bring
the advocacy of the Women's Caucus, as an effort which arose to specifically
address negotiations, to a close. It has been a long and multi-layered effort to
this point with the involvement of many, many women from all over the world. The
achievements and the Court now belong to everyone. <BR><BR>Advocacy around the
world's first permanent criminal court is unprecedented and so is the NGO
advocacy needed. Women's groups around the world must now own the ICC and
incorporate this new mechanism of international justice and accountability more
fully into the consciousness of our work and strategies.<BR><BR>While the
Women's Caucus for Gender Justice, as a negotiation-focused initiative, has
fulfilled its purpose and is being brought to a close, the effort to bring the
critical gender and political perspectives to the work of the Court and help
ensure the gender gains continue to be implemented will continue in different
ways.<BR><BR>One of these ways will be through an effort known as Women's
Initiatives for Gender Justice which will have a staff person in The Hague but
which will emphasize the development of regional capacities. We will be closing
the Women's Caucus' New York office soon to mark the completion of this historic
initiative and will be in touch as plans continue to develop toward the
future.<BR><BR>We offer our thanks and congratulations to all those who
contributed in any way to this effort - through participation in preparatory
commission meetings, advocacy in capitols, responding to action alerts,
participating in workshops and trainings and subsequent awareness-raising,
through offering insights and expertise in documents, proposals and
recommendations, not to mention the invaluable assistance of staff, volunteers,
interns, and translators. <BR><BR>We also thank the donors, foundations and
government agencies who have supported the Women's Caucus advocacy in the ICC
negotiations. We encourage you to continue to seek out and support the efforts
of women's groups to ensure real gender justice and accountability. <BR><BR>With
best regards and in deepest solidarity,<BR><BR>Ariane Brunet, Canada<BR>Lorena
Fries, Chile<BR>Anissa Helie, Algeria/France<BR>Betty Murungi, Chair,
Kenya<BR>Gabriela Mischkowski, Germany<BR>Vahida Nainar, India<BR>Pam Spees,
U.S.A.<BR><BR><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>