<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:HelveticaNeue;
panose-1:0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-CA link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Thank you Peter<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I am understanding more that tree inspection policies at least are in place for municipalities. There are property standards bylaws as well. I will be undertaking this research next. I always wonder how many municipalities actually have Tree Risk Assessment Policies in place? Perhaps for the ones that do they could share with us? This particular tree was an extreme risk prior to casualty easily identified by my experience and skills.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Jack Radecki<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US> CANUFNET <canufnet-bounces@list.web.net> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Peter Shields via CANUFNET<br><b>Sent:</b> October 19, 2022 10:59 AM<br><b>To:</b> Canadian Urban Forest Network <canufnet@list.web.net><br><b>Cc:</b> Peter Shields <peter.shields1@hotmail.com><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CANUFNET] Municipal Tree Risk Assessment Policies<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Hello Jack,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'>It has been my experience these details are in the actual bylaw. </span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:#212121'>Some have a line stating they can enter adjacent lands to mitigate where a tree may negatively impact infrastructure. Some have the ability to issue an order to a tree owner for the same. And if they do not, they can sometimes put the costs on their tax bill. Generally, they only manage Municipal Trees, not private trees.</span><span style='color:#212121'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'>It is impossible all risks are known to the municipality. Also, extreme risks are very rare as they are usually dealt with immediately so I may suggest to exercise caution in deeming a tree as such post casualty. </span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;color:#212121'>Tree owners have a duty of care, including their trees and what a reasonable understanding of risks may be.</span><span style='color:#212121'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'>One last thing, municipalities generally do not assess private trees. If there is an obvious inherent risk, sometimes they may notify if seen. These would be for trees that are failing imminently or deemed an actual hazard. This is critically important to distinguish.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'>It sounds like it should be provable the municipality knew about the extreme risk and did not do anything to mitigate.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'>Cheers,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='background:white'><span style='color:#212121'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div id=ms-outlook-mobile-signature><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;color:black;background:white'>Peter Shields</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"HelveticaNeue",serif;color:black'><br></span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;color:black;background:white'>RCA, ISA BCMA, TRAQ</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"HelveticaNeue",serif;color:black'><br></span><a href="olm://message-contents/AQACAAAAyQAAAAAAAAAAyAkBAAAAAAAA1AAAAAAAAQJDAAAAAAABCcgAAAAAAAECQwIAAIABAAAAMnBldGVyLnNoaWVsZHMxQGhvdG1haWwuY29tX0FjdGl2ZVN5bmNNaWNyb3NvZnRfSHhT/www.shieldstree.com"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#0078D4;background:white'>www.shieldstree.com</span></a><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"HelveticaNeue",serif;color:black'><br></span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;color:black;background:white'><a href="tel:+17055004860"><span style='color:#0078D4'>(705) 500-4860</span></a></span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><hr size=2 width="98%" align=center></div><div id=divRplyFwdMsg><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='color:black'>From:</span></b><span style='color:black'> CANUFNET <<a href="mailto:canufnet-bounces@list.web.net">canufnet-bounces@list.web.net</a>> on behalf of Naomi Zurcher via CANUFNET <<a href="mailto:canufnet@list.web.net">canufnet@list.web.net</a>><br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, October 19, 2022 9:53:56 AM<br><b>To:</b> Canadian Urban Forest Network <<a href="mailto:canufnet@list.web.net">canufnet@list.web.net</a>><br><b>Cc:</b> Naomi Zurcher <<a href="mailto:treerap@sprintmail.com">treerap@sprintmail.com</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [CANUFNET] Municipal Tree Risk Assessment Policies</span> <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Does the municipality have a Right-of-Way ordinance which would have changed the status of the private tree to a public tree given its proximity to a publicly accessible roadway? <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Naomi Zürcher<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Oct 19, 2022, at 9:02 AM, Jack Radecki via CANUFNET <<a href="mailto:canufnet@list.web.net">canufnet@list.web.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>I posted this morning on the American Society of Consulting Arborists Listserve the post as shown below. I know that many municipal tree managers subscribe to CANUFNET with hopes of getting an opinion or even a confirmation from within the Tree Risk Assessment Policy. Anyone is welcome to provide their opinions here. See below.</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'> </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>“I am looking for precedents or opinions on private trees targeting municipal rights of way. In this case a badly decayed willow had fallen across a roadway injuring a pedestrian. There was no sidewalk and the tree fell across the whole roadway. I have reviewed pictures showing extensive decay in a large open wound on the main stem easily visible from the roadway. This tree would easily have been labelled as an extreme risk for failure by a competent tree inspector. I do note that the shoot growth and foliage size and colour was still good despite the structural defect. As target is one of the 3 main components of tree risk assessment, should the municipality showed due diligence in inspecting this private tree targeting the road allowance that pedestrians frequently use? Does the responsibility fall to the municipality to note and take steps (action) to have the tree removed in terms of notice to the owners? Now that the tragedy has occured and litigation has begun what can be expected as a result? Remember that this is a private tree. I wonder how many municipal tree risk assessment policies include private trees? In 2005 I was retained within a coroners inquest sadly for a child death on an educational trail at a botanical garden. As a result of the decision from the inquest a mandate was initiated to have all Conservation Authorities, Municipalities and Private Institutions create and maintain a Tree Risk Assessment Policy.”<br><br>Jack Radecki RCA 342 Lindsay, Ontario, Canada</span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div></body></html>