[getsmart-l] Safe Food Campaign

23 Skidoo twenty-three-skidoo at hotmail.com
Sat Dec 22 09:27:02 EST 2007


http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/GE0707/S00131.htmDanger in Diet Coke & Wrigley’s gum? Safe Food Campaign
(excerpts)Two popular products which provide leading sales in supermarkets all over New Zealand have been reaching public attention recently due to the efforts of young Wellington actress Abby Cormack. Diet Coke and Wrigley’s chewing gum have been singled out by Abby as factors in her two-year-long medical problems, but in actual fact a long list of common diet, fitness and medicine products contain the added chemical sweetener, aspartame, which is behind a lot of health problems many New Zealanders are innocently suffering without being able to identify a cause, according to critics.(snip)The basic problem with aspartame in the eyes of its critics lies in the fact that food safety regulators and the standard medical profession themselves are either defensive or unaware of the health problems which aspartame may create when the synthetic sweetener breaks down in the human digestive system into three potential toxins, methanol, aspartic acid and phenylalanine. Aspartame’s regulatory official and industry supporters always cite the fact that these three breakdown products also appear in many foods, but ignore the fact that normally they only appear in natural foodstuffs combined with a large range of beneficial minerals, enzymes, vitamins, proteins and other associated normal food inclusions. In the synthetic form which aspartame offers, the consumer gets a solid “hit” of pure methanol, aspartic acid and phenylalanine without any of the accompanying beneficial food inclusions which otherwise might buffer aspartame’s attack on the human body’s nervous system and brain. This is where the medical problems associated with aspartame use lie according to the chemical’s critics.Dialling into the Internet these days results in over 2.5 million “hits” on the topic “aspartame”, most of them from sites documenting medical problems with aspartame products and attacking the industry-influenced approval process which saw the chemical released onto the world market by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1981 due to the influence of then G. D. Searle CEO Donald Rumsfeld. Aspartame-triggered health problems are now popularly termed “Rumsfeld Disease” by critics, including NZ visitor, Betty Martini, who heads the consumer activist group Mission Possible, represented in New Zealand by Safe Food Campaign member, Chris Wheeler.
 
Please also note these sites:
 
http://www.dldewey.com/columns/asparf.htm
 
http://www.cspinet.org/new/200706251.html
 








FDA Should Reconsider Aspartame Cancer Risk, Say ExpertsNew Rat Study Links Artificial Sweetener with Lymphomas, Breast Cancer 

WASHINGTON—A new long-term animal test from an Italian cancer institute raises serious safety questions about the artificial sweetener aspartame, which is marketed generically as well as under the NutraSweet and Equal brand names. A dozen toxicology and epidemiology experts and the nonprofit Center for Science in the Public Interest are calling on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to immediately review the study, which found increases in lymphomas, leukemias, and breast cancers in rats. If FDA concludes that aspartame does cause cancer in animals, the agency is required by law to revoke its approval for the controversial sweetener, which is used in Diet Pepsi, Diet Coke, tabletop packets, and countless other foods. 
The new study, conducted by the respected Ramazzini Foundation and published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, found statistically significant increases in lymphomas and leukemias in rats that were fed 100 milligrams of the sweetener per kilogram of body weight—an amount several times higher than what some people consume. A lower amount, 20 milligrams per kilogram, also caused an increase, but it was not statistically significant. 
“Because aspartame is so widely consumed, it is urgent that the FDA evaluate whether aspartame still poses a ‘reasonable certainty of no harm,’ the standard used for gauging the safety of food additives,” said CSPI executive director Michael F. Jacobson. “But consumers, particularly parents, shouldn’t wait for the FDA to act. People shouldn’t panic, but they should stop buying beverages and foods containing aspartame.” 
The Acceptable Daily Intake of aspartame in the United States is 50 mg per kg of body weight. The new study looked at doses less than that (20 mg per kg) and greater (100 mg per kg). Though few people would consume aspartame at the higher dose, the lower does is equivalent to a 50-pound child drinking 2½ cans of diet soda per day, or a 150-pound adult drinking about 7½ cans of diet soda per day. But aspartame also enters the diet through sugar-free or reduced-sugar gums, candies, yogurts, and hundreds of other products. Many aspartame-containing products are likely to be consumed by kids, including sugar-free Kool-Aid, Jell-O gelatin dessert and pudding mixes, and some Popsicles. 
A 2006 National Cancer Institute study seemed to ease cancer fears related to aspartame, but that study had major limitations, including its reliance on imprecise food-frequency questionnaires, and it included only subjects between the ages of 50 and 69 who first consumed aspartame as adults. The effects of consuming aspartame from infancy or childhood might be very different, says CSPI, as suggested by the new animal study. 
Among those who today called on FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach to review the new aspartame study are former Occupational Safety and Health Administration officials John Froines (now at UCLA) and Peter F. Infante (now at George Washington University); James Huff, current Associate Director for Chemical Carcinogenesis at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS); and Kamal M. Abdo, a toxicologist formerly at the National Toxicology Program of the NIEHS. 
As a result of the new study, for the first time CSPI downgraded aspartame on its online Chemical Cuisine directory from a “use caution” rating to “everyone should avoid.” CSPI also urges everyone to avoid the artificial sweeteners acesulfame potassium and saccharin. It rates sucralose, also known by the brand name Splenda, as safe. 
CSPI also called on the food industry to voluntarily switch to other sugar substitutes. 
“Switching to safer ingredients now could be a wise precautionary action,” Jacobson wrote to Cal Dooley, president of the Food Products Association/Grocery Manufactures Association. 
According to a 1996 report in the Minneapolis Star Tribune, the FDA rejected repeated proposals by NIEHS to test aspartame using more modern methods than were originally used. David Rall, the former director of NIEHS and its National Toxicology Program, said, “any compound that is that widely used needs to be retested with modern methods every once in a while.” The State of California, too, has urged new testing of aspartame. The FDA also rejected NIEHS’s proposal to test acesulfame potassium, which CSPI says was “abysmally tested” by its manufacturer and showed signs of causing cancer in animals. 
_________________________________________________________________
Read what Santa`s been up to! For all the latest, visit asksantaclaus.spaces.live.com!
http://asksantaclaus.spaces.live.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://list.web.net/archives/getsmart-l/attachments/20071222/2cec9fbb/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the getsmart-l mailing list