[CANUFNET] Tree of Heaven RE: CANUFNET Digest, Vol 89, Issue 5
Kowalyk, Bohdan (MNR)
bohdan.kowalyk at ontario.ca
Thu Jun 14 11:32:38 EDT 2012
There are two separate issues involved that are getting confused. One
(my interest) is about what (if any) urban areas would be appropriate
for proliferating non-native tree species and whether more emphasis
should be placed during design of urbanizing areas on providing
conditions suitable for representative native species. The other issue
of human health effects from pollen is altogether different and
apparently pushed primarily by drug companies.
Bohdan
-----Original Message-----
From: canufnet-bounces at list.web.net
[mailto:canufnet-bounces at list.web.net] On Behalf Of Philip van Wassenaer
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 9:31 AM
To: 'Canadian Urban Forest Network'
Subject: Re: [CANUFNET] Tree of Heaven RE: CANUFNET Digest, Vol 89,
Issue 5
I second that motion. Let's not protect ourselves so much that we all
get
hermetically sealed off from the nature that produced us!
Philip van Wassenaer, B.SC., MFC
Principal Consultant
Urban Forest Innovations Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
www.urbanforestinnovations.com
-----Original Message-----
From: canufnet-bounces at list.web.net
[mailto:canufnet-bounces at list.web.net]
On Behalf Of James Urban
Sent: June-14-12 8:51 AM
To: Canadian Urban Forest Network
Subject: Re: [CANUFNET] Tree of Heaven RE: CANUFNET Digest, Vol 89,
Issue 5
I wish that we would focus our attention on the larger picture. The
most
destructive and invasive species, by far on the planet are humans. Or
you
could take the opposite approach and say humans are a part of the
natural
evolution of the planet (we are nature) and the changes we bring to this
evolutionary process is just nature at work. In either case I think we
worry about small things we think we can control while missing the
larger
more important items that maybe we cannot control but which need to be a
part of the discussion.
We live in a cloud of pollen and I doubt that the small change in pollen
caused by the few plants that we can control make a significant
difference
in overall levels. But I do believe that if we fail to get a healthy
(pollen producing) urban canopy, we will continue to drive people into
their
AC controlled homes. Getting people out of contact with all the nasty
things that are in the outdoor environment has been shown to increase
the
allergies we think we are trying to protect people from in the first
place.
Breath the air, sneeze in pollen season, take Claritin if you must, but
continue to fight for large canopy trees that will cool the city and
make
the city a better place to live.
Jim Urban
Urban Trees + Soils
410 263 4838
On Jun 13, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Kowalyk, Bohdan (MNR) wrote:
> Wouldn't a male clone still release pollen able to travel distances
> for reproduction with the uncontrolled population?
>
> Bohdan
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: canufnet-bounces at list.web.net
> [mailto:canufnet-bounces at list.web.net] On Behalf Of James Urban
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 9:07 AM
> To: Canadian Urban Forest Network
> Subject: Re: [CANUFNET] Tree of Heaven RE: CANUFNET Digest, Vol 89,
> Issue 5
>
> Tree of heaven can be invasive, but if you specify a male cultivar
> those plants are not. unfortunately the male cultivar is still in
> development so you will have to wait a few more years. Jut file this
> away until you see the male cultivar released.
>
> However. Tree of heaven is not at all like sumac. It is a huge tree
> while sumac is a small tree.
>
> Jim Urban
> Urban Trees + Soils
> 410 263 4838
>
>
>
> On Jun 10, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Iola Price wrote:
>
>> It will take me a bit of time (that I don't have at this point) to
>> dig through my files to verify, but isn't Tree of Heaven considered
> invasive or
>> potentially so in Ontario? Iola Price
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: canufnet-bounces at list.web.net
> [mailto:canufnet-bounces at list.web.net]
>> On Behalf Of canufnet-request at list.web.net
>> Sent: June 10, 2012 12:00 PM
>> To: canufnet at list.web.net
>> Subject: CANUFNET Digest, Vol 89, Issue 5
>>
>> Send CANUFNET mailing list submissions to
>> canufnet at list.web.net
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> http://list.web.net/lists/listinfo/canufnet
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> canufnet-request at list.web.net
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> canufnet-owner at list.web.net
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than
>> "Re: Contents of CANUFNET digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: CTLA appraisals in Ontario (Oliver Reichl)
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 11:40:07 -0400
>> From: Oliver Reichl <careofthetrees at gmail.com>
>> To: Canadian Urban Forest Network <canufnet at list.web.net>
>> Subject: Re: [CANUFNET] CTLA appraisals in Ontario
>> Message-ID:
>>
> <CA+3+qfHDZ4KeDoddcVasNoMt1ZTMNCFsK16ibR+V+CHt2ewROw at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> Thanks Alex/Ian/John for your replies. Some comments:
>>
>> 1) ISAO is apparently out of supplements and all they gave me was a
>> photocopy of the list of species ratings. No worksheet. Anyone have a
> pdf of
>> the whole supplement and wanna share?
>> 2) Things started with native species on this site, and I'm very
> partial to
>> keeping it that way. Of course, I'd also prefer stock from locally
> sourced
>> seed. I chose *Ulmus americana* 'Princeton' because its apparently
>> DED resistent, still the same species, and available in the client's
>> area,
> even
>> if it probably isn't genetically "local".
>> 3) For sumac, in the absence of a worksheet, I'm leaning towards the
> species
>> rating for Tree-of-Heaven (because of similar leaf shape, similarly
>> soft-wooded, and its low rating).
>> 4) Both "scrubby" and "tree form" Manitoba maples occur on the site.
>> I
> like
>> Alex's *Acer* alternates, and am also considering *A. saccharinum*.
>> Basswood has also been suggested to me, I presume because its
> similarly
>> soft-wooded and also inclined to be multi-stemmed).
>> 5) Yes, big quotes take time to put together, but I definitely share
> Ian's
>> opinion on this. Paying for one quote is one thing, but 3x or more
>> can
> get
>> pricey pretty quick. I think my future response will be to
> spontaneously
>> levy a "quote administration fee" equal to the amount someone wants
> for
>> submitting a quote. They probably won't like that one bit, but odds
> are that
>> anyone who's that focused on profiteering isn't gonna be your lowest
> quote
>> anyway.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Oliver K. Reichl, B.E.S.(Hons)
>> Consulting Arborist-Ecologist
>> ISA Certified Arborist #ON-1178A
>> 18 Larue Mills Rd.
>> 1000 Islands, ON K0E 1R0
>> Tel: 613-923-8833
>> Email: careofthetrees at gmail.com
>> Web: www.oliverkilian.com/treecare
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Hennessy, John
>> <John.Hennessy at brampton.ca>wrote:
>>
>>> Ian and Oliver,****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> We have been monitoring our Zelkovia over the past two years. Not a
>>> long history, however we have had enough winter kill in exposed
>>> areas
>
>>> to adjust our expectations . Our Zelkovia planted in the spring did
>>> moderately better than those planted in the fall. However, any
>>> Zelkovia planted with open north westerly exposure, did
>>> poorly.(60%mortality, 30% pedestal suckering mess?s!). ****
>>>
>>> This is the second positive comment with regards to ?sensation?. We
>>> will be adding ?sensation to our list 2013, thank you. Our ?pioneer?
>>> and ?homestead? are hardy where the Zelkovia fell short. We use all
>>> three, in desirable and undesirable sites, to continue to diversify.
>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> John Hennessy****
>>>
>>> City of Brampton****
>>>
>>> Forestry Inspector****
>>>
>>> ISA ON1193a ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* canufnet-bounces at list.web.net [mailto:
>>> canufnet-bounces at list.web.net] *On Behalf Of *Ian Wilson
>>> *Sent:* 2012/06/05 10:54 AM
>>>
>>> *To:* 'Canadian Urban Forest Network'
>>> *Subject:* Re: [CANUFNET] CTLA appraisals in Ontario****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Oliver,****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> In the Pacific NW ISA Chapter we gave staghorn sumac a rating of 55.
>
>>> In my area (interior British Columbia) sumac is somewhat invasive
>>> and
>
>>> I would tend to rate it lower, although I have seen it used
>>> successfully for stabilizing steep banks and it also seems to be
>>> very
>
>>> drought resistant.***
>>> *
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Acer negundo has a bad reputation for good reasons, but there is a
>>> clone of Acer negundo that we have experimented with in the last
>>> five
>> years ?
>>> Acer negundo ?Sensation?. It?s a male cultivar (no seeds or
>>> boxelder
>
>>> bugs), it has an attractive reddish leaf colour (year round) and is
>>> a
>
>>> medium size tree. It is relatively fast growing so I suspect in the
>>> long run it might have some of the weak wood and decay issues as the
>>> Acer negundo species, but in the right place I think it might be a
>>> good tree choice. I have been impressed with this tree in parking
> lot
>>> islands and in sidewalk cutouts where there is very limited soil and
>>> harsh conditions that would kill most trees. At a Canadian Tire
>>> parking lot near my house I have watched some of these trees over
>>> the
>
>>> last 8 years growing in very small volumes of soil and as a result
>>> they are growing quite slowly, but they don?t seem to be showing any
>>> symptoms of decline or stress and they aren?t lifting any asphalt
> (not
>>> yet anyway) in spite of the lack of any root barriers. ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> One tree that I?ve been impressed with as an American elm
>>> alternative
>
>>> is Zelkova serrata. We don?t have too many of them but they seem to
>>> be very vigorous and well adapted to boulevards and difficult sites,
>>> and quite
>>> attractive.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> I don?t think we?ve ever paid a nursery / landscaper for a quote ? I
>>> would expect they would offer free quotes if they want our
>>> business.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Ian Wilson****
>>>
>>> City of Kelowna****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* canufnet-bounces at list.web.net [
>>> mailto:canufnet-bounces at list.web.net
>>> <canufnet-bounces at list.web.net>]
>
>>> *On Behalf Of *Oliver Reichl
>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 04, 2012 7:18 AM
>>> *To:* Canadian Urban Forest Network
>>> *Subject:* [CANUFNET] CTLA appraisals in Ontario****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Greetings:****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> I'm doing a large appraisal project that has brought up a couple of
>>> interesting issues. I'm keen to hear your opinions.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> 1) the Ontario supplement does not contain a species rating for
>>> Staghorn sumac, *Rhus typhina*. What would you consider the best
>>> alternative to use for a species rating? (I have one in mind ...
>>> just
>
>>> curious to hear what others may have used and why).****
>>>
>>> 2) *Acer negundo* (crapwood) and *Ulmus americana* (disease-prone)
> are
>>> not available in the marketplace. What would you consider the best
>>> alternatives to use for replacement plant material? (Again, I have
>>> ones in mind ... but curious to hear what others suggest or may have
> used
>> and why).
>>> ****
>>>
>>> 3) quotes for replacement trees and their delivery/installation are
> an
>>> integral part of the valuations. How much, if anything, would you
>>> pay
>
>>> a nursery or landscaping firm for a quote?
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Looking forward to any replies,
>>>
>>> Oliver K. Reichl, B.E.S.(Hons)
>>> Consulting Arborist-Ecologist
>>> ISA Certified Arborist #ON-1178A
>>> 18 Larue Mills Rd.
>>> 1000 Islands, ON K0E 1R0
>>> Tel: 613-923-8833
>>> Email: careofthetrees at gmail.com
>>> Web: www.oliverkilian.com/treecare****
>>>
>>> Please review the City of Brampton e-mail disclaimer statement at:
>>> www.brampton.ca/en/Info-Centre/Pages/Privacy-Statement.aspx
>>>
>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
>> scrubbed...
>> URL:
>>
> <http://list.web.net/pipermail/canufnet/attachments/20120609/fa9d68da/
> at
> tach
>> ment-0001.htm>
>>
>> End of CANUFNET Digest, Vol 89, Issue 5
>> ***************************************
>>
>
More information about the CANUFNET
mailing list