[CANUFNET] Planting trees in soil with no compaction at all

[Michael Richardson]

Bulk density is essentially determined by the soil texture and 
compaction.  Soils with no compaction are simply described by texture 
that then provides particle type, and size distribution, that create 
bulk density.

Low bulk density soils, such as "engineered" structural soils for 
landscape projects, sometimes do not provide enough resistance to 
movement of roots when large loads are applied.  This is often due to 
low particle density and high organic matter content and resulting 
relatively large pore space.

Structural soils are not to be compacted but seem to fail trees on many 
occasions.  Structural soils have been known to allow tree failure (what 
is really a soil failure) with stories out of Europe.

I would check the work by Nina Bassuk as a starting point for 
references.

Michael

On 2025-03-25 21:44, Mike James via CANUFNET wrote:

> It is received wisdom that trees need to be planted in soils that are 
> lightly tamped to:
> 
> * provide some resistance and support for tree roots
> * prevent settlement of root balls
> * prevent large airgaps that disconnect root/soil contact
> 
> However, I cannot find any independent, scholarly research that proves 
> this through case studies or comparative empirical testing.
> 
> Almost all of the research is about too much compaction.
> 
> I can't find any research that shows the effect of totally uncompacted 
> loose soil (no tamping)  on tree health and stability.
> 
> I am reaching out to the community to see if you can provide me with 
> links to research you might be aware of on this topic.
> 
> Thank you in advance.
> 
> DeepRoot - YouTube [1]



Links:
------
[1] https://www.youtube.com/@Deeproot/videos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.web.net/pipermail/canufnet/attachments/20250326/63b993e4/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9683 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.web.net/pipermail/canufnet/attachments/20250326/63b993e4/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 18004 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.web.net/pipermail/canufnet/attachments/20250326/63b993e4/attachment-0001.png>