[homeles_ot-l] Fw: Minority Ontario government creates political opportunity for much-needed provincial housing plan WI backgrounder

[Lynne Browne]

FYI . . . Ontario Election analysis. 

----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Shapcott <Michael at wellesleyinstitute.com>
To: Michael Shapcott <Michael at wellesleyinstitute.com>
Sent: Fri Oct 07 13:04:53 2011
Subject: WI backgrounder: Minority Ontario government creates political opportunity for much-needed provincial housing plan

The minority Legislature offers a political opportunity to achieve many of the goals that we have collectively been working towards for years in Ontario. I wanted to share this item which I have just posted on the Wellesley Institute blog. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. Also, please feel free to copy, post and distribute.

 

-          Michael

 

***

 

Minority Ontario government creates opportunity to bring in much-needed four-point housing plan <http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/blog/minority-ontario-government-creates-opportunity-to-bring-in-much-needed-four-point-housing-plan/> 

Michael Shapcott, Director of Housing

The minority Liberal government voters elected on October 6 provides a political opportunity for Ontario to realize a long-overdue and much-needed four-point affordable housing plan. The province’s last two minority governments delivered robust housing initiatives: In 1975, the province’s first rent regulation and tenant protection laws, which grew more substantial and effective until they were significantly dismantled in 1998; and Ontario’s first major affordable housing programs in 1985, which were successfully increased until they were shut down in 1995.

The signs of Ontario’s province-wide housing distress <http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/news/wellesley-election-guides-2011-what-are-you-going-to-ask-candidates-when-they-ask-you-for-your-vote/attachment/housing-election-2011-3/>  are clear: one in every three Ontario renter households are in core housing need – the federal government’s definition of precarious housing. Approximately 1.3 million provincial households pay 30 percent or more of their income on housing, the official definition of unaffordable housing. There are more than 152,000 households on affordable housing waiting lists across Ontario. Housing is not only the single biggest expense in the monthly budget of low and moderate-income households, but the high cost of housing is one of the biggest factors driving people to food banks because they don’t have enough money to pay the rent, and cover other basics such as food, energy, transportation and child care. Housing is also one of the most important fundamentals for good health for individuals and for the entire population. However, federal and provincial investments in affordable housing are set to drop sharply this year, and continue to d <<image001.jpg>> ecline after 2014.

 <http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/blog/minority-ontario-government-creates-opportunity-to-bring-in-much-needed-four-point-housing-plan/attachment/img_9315-copy/> 

A four-point housing agenda for the new minority Ontario government would include the following:

New affordable homes: Most parts of Ontario urgently need more affordable homes to accommodate people that are homeless or in grossly substandard and over-crowded housing, and also to deal with population growth. A provincial inclusionary housing policy that authorizes municipalities to introduce planning rules that would require affordable housing in all new developments is one important measure, but it needs to be combined with a long-term affordable housing supply initiative that includes committed funding. In recent years, most affordable housing development dollars in Ontario have come from the federal government, with some of these dollars matched by the province. But the federal housing investments are eroding ($1.2 billion in housing cuts this year alone), and Ontario has no plan to deal with the federal withdrawal.

Affordability measures: A universal housing benefit that would help cover the gap between household income and housing costs is long overdue. The Ontario government has dabbled in various housing supplements over the years, but – as the auditor-general noted in 2009 – none have been particularly well designed. With conventional ownership housing increasingly out of reach for low, moderate and even middle-income households, and the federal government committed to tightening mortgage eligibility rules even more, the pressure is building on the province’s private rental and social housing stock. But vacancies are low, and rents are rising in private rental markets throughout the province.

Rent regulation / rental housing protection: For almost a quarter of a century, Ontario had increasingly effective rent regulation and rental housing protection laws. In 1998, the provincial government of the day introduced “vacancy decontrol,” which allows landlords to charge any rent they want on a vacant unit. This has allowed rents to increase significantly, often much higher than the mandated provincial guideline. In addition, rent regulation is waived for newly constructed buildings. The gaps in rent regulation laws need to be patched. Ontario used to have a law that slowed the demolition or conversion of private rental housing. Although the province’s population is increasing, and there is a growing need for new rental homes, the private rental housing universe has been stagnant or declining in most parts of the province. The previous law required landlords seeking to take private rental housing off the market to ensure that the tenants were re-housed. Rent regulation and rental housing protection are key components of a critically important enhancement of tenant protection laws.

Ending homelessness / linking with supports: Ontario is lagging behind other provinces, including Alberta, in making a commitment – and backing it with a solid plan and funding – to end homelessness. The province’s so-called long-term affordable housing strategy does contain some useful measures, including a commitment to work with municipalities to create more flexibility among a variety of disjointed provincial homelessness and housing programs, but a specific provincial plan with adequate funding is lacking. A key to preventing and ending homelessness is an effective strategy that links health and social supports with housing through a “housing first” approach – successfully used in a growing number of US and Canadian jurisdictions. Ontario’s supportive housing policies have not kept pace with innovative developments in Canada and internationally. 

***

 

Michael Shapcott

Director, Housing and Innovation, Wellesley Institute

 

10 Alcorn Ave Suite 300

Toronto, ON, Canada   M4V 3B2

 

e: michael at wellesleyinstitute.com <mailto:jo at wellesleyinstitute.com> 

o: 416.972.1010 ex. 231

c: 416.605-8316

w: www.wellesleyinstitute.com <http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/>  

 

Get the Wellesley Institute newsletter here <http://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/newsletter> . 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.web.net/lists/private/homeles_ot-l/attachments/20111007/a91c1a67/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 16021 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://list.web.net/lists/private/homeles_ot-l/attachments/20111007/a91c1a67/attachment-0001.jpeg>