[homeles_ot-l] Fwd: [New post] Article explains and critiques current federal housing budget plans

Thu Apr 6 06:56:14 EDT 2017

Bill Dare posted: " Article from http://spacing.ca/national/2017/04/05/
hulchanski-trudeaus-housing-spending-smoke-mirrors/ by leading
housing/homeless policy leader HULCHANSKI: Trudeau’s housing spending is
smoke and mirrors APRIL 5, 2017 | BY DAVID HULCHANSKI In "
Respond to this post by replying above this line
New post on *Social & Health Practice Ottawa*
<https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/author/socialhealthpracticeottawa/>
Article
explains and critiques current federal housing budget plans
<https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/2017/04/06/article-explains-and-critiques-current-federal-housing-budget-plans/>
by
Bill Dare
<https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/author/socialhealthpracticeottawa/>
Article from http://spacing.ca/national/2017/04/05/
hulchanski-trudeaus-housing-spending-smoke-mirrors/ by leading
housing/homeless policy leader HULCHANSKI: Trudeau’s housing spending is
smoke and mirrors
APRIL 5, 2017
<http://spacing.ca/national/2017/04/05/hulchanski-trudeaus-housing-spending-smoke-mirrors/>
| BY DAVID HULCHANSKI <http://spacing.ca/national/author/davidhulchanski/>

In a year when the high cost of housing dominates the headlines, this
year’s federal budget <http://www.budget.gc.ca/2017/home-accueil-en.html>
is promoting a bright shiny object: the allocation of $11 billion for
housing.

Well before budget day, we were told to expect that $11 billion. On budget
day, there it was, in all its glory.

But when you look closer, the money is not actually there. It’s not real.
The $11 billion for housing is an alternative fact, distracting us from a
gaping hole in the budget figures.

The bright shiny object has, unfortunately, led many NGOs and charities to
praise the Liberal government. The praise is likely the product of hope
mixed with fear. The promise comes from a political party with a
well-earned reputation for not keeping its promises.

The fear is that the Liberal Party’s housing policy has not changed since
the 1990s.

After promising a host of progressive housing initiatives during the 1993
election that returned them to power, the triumphant Liberals then declared
that housing was no longer a federal responsibility, that no more social
housing would be funded, and that existing federally owned public housing
would be downloaded to the provinces.

Then-Finance Minister Paul Martin, in his *Budget Plan* of March 6, 1996,
stated: “CMHC will phase out its remaining role in social housing, except
for housing on Indian reserves. The first step has already been taken –
there has been no funding for new social housing units since 1993. To
further clarify jurisdiction in the social housing field, the federal
government is now prepared to offer provincial and territorial governments
the opportunity to take over the management of existing social housing
resources.”

Twenty-one years later, the most troubling proviso in this budget is that
the $11 billion will be spent over eleven years. *Eleven* years? Not three?
Not five?

Out of a budget of more than $300 billion annually, is $1 billion a year
the best that one of the wealthiest countries on Earth can do? Is our
housing system so well developed, are Canadians so well housed, are there
so few un-housed people, that the remaining social need for housing
assistance now requires only a tiny fraction of our federal monies?

Worse, the amount pledged is not an *average* of $1 billion per year. It is
not huge spending now, tailing off over the remaining years. Instead, there
will be almost no new money for housing until after the next election.

That shiny $11 billion object cannot obscure what’s on Page 151 in the
Budget <http://www.budget.gc.ca/2017/docs/plan/budget-2017-en.pdf>, a page
with few words and many numbers. Look closely at those columns full of
zeros or very small numbers.

All those zeros sit next to the impressive list of housing initiatives
included this year with a paltry $20 million allocation next year and the
following year, with only $305 million.

Let’s face it: there is no new money for housing this year, and almost
nothing for next year. Furthermore, only $3.1 billion of that bright shiny
$11 billion is accounted for during the initial five years. The “$11
billion” is an alternative fact for partisan political use.

We now have it in writing that the Liberal government has no plan for any
significant spending to address Canada’s housing needs until after the next
election.

Yes, last year’s budget allocated $2.3 billion over two years and partly
responds to some of the 2015 election promises. But that’s it, out of two
budgets that allocate more than $600 billion dollars in total.

We should judge politicians and parties by what they *do*, not by what they
say. The current budget offers no real change from the 1990s philosophy
about the limited role of the federal government in Canada’s housing system
– aside from the mortgage system.

But let’s look at a budget that actually described expenditure decisions
rather than producing partisan talking points. Let’s go back to a previous
Trudeau government.

In 1981, interest rates were high, house construction was in a slump,
unemployment soared. Given these realities, the 1981 budget introduced a
new Canada Rental Supply Plan and then, in 1982, doubled the allocation to
33,000 new private-sector rental units.

The 1982 budget provided funding for a Canadian Home Ownership Stimulation
Plan. It doubled the existing Canada Home Renovation Plan, and increased
the annual allocation for non-profit and co-operative housing from 25,000
units to 27,500 units for that year.

Those budget announcements were real and immediate, and actually resulted
in the construction of affordable ownership, private rental, and social
housing, not to mention the creation of thousands of construction jobs.

The cost was about $1 billion in new spending (inflation-adjusted to 2017),
on top of existing housing expenditures – e.g., amounts set aside to build
20,000 to 25,000 new social housing units annually.

Now look at last year’s budget, which included funds for a new affordable
rental housing innovation program. How much “innovative” rental housing?
Just 4,000 units — over five years. In other words, 800 units per year for
the *entire country*. Really?

Really.

We used to recognize and make some progress in addressing the pressing
housing needs facing Canadians. As a nation, we have the wealth and ability
to do so. But our government no longer chooses to address housing shortages.

In an era of alternative facts, it is easy to confuse voters so as to
maintain our housing system as it is — a highly efficient mechanism for
increasing inequality – rather than providing adequate and affordable
housing for all Canadians. We reformed our health care system decades ago.
It’s time to reform our housing system.

Who will be the Tommy Douglas of our housing system?

*photo by Marcus Bowman*
------------------------------

*David Hulchanski is Professor, Housing and Community Development,
Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto. Follow him
at @Hulchanski <https://twitter.com/hulchanski>.*
*Bill Dare
<https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/author/socialhealthpracticeottawa/>*
| April 6, 2017 at 10:54 am | Categories: Income Security & access to the
social determinants of health
<https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/?cat=399736511>, Social
Policy meets the Frontline
<https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/?cat=251633236>,
Uncategorized <https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/?cat=1> |
URL: http://wp.me/pI0h2-j8

Comment
<https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/2017/04/06/article-explains-and-critiques-current-federal-housing-budget-plans/#respond>
   See all comments
<https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/2017/04/06/article-explains-and-critiques-current-federal-housing-budget-plans/#comments>
   Like
<https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/2017/04/06/article-explains-and-critiques-current-federal-housing-budget-plans/?like_actor=10795109&like_hmac=ae9cbf0ae71ac1c86f237da98dd23f4e&postid=1186&like=1&source=sub_email>

Unsubscribe
<https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=d836df34e55c01f4052b6b8fe28b5fd0&email=bill.dare%40gmail.com&b=Lc-7oQ62il%26l%5BXMwYTO%2C.qSjEu%3DCkN%2F%5DoccZk-4Ko8IklME8wiK>
to no longer receive posts from Social & Health Practice Ottawa.
Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions
<https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=d836df34e55c01f4052b6b8fe28b5fd0&email=bill.dare%40gmail.com>.

*Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://socialhealthpracticeottawa.wordpress.com/2017/04/06/
article-explains-and-critiques-current-federal-housing-budget-plans/
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com <https://wordpress.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.web.net/pipermail/homeles_ot-l/attachments/20170406/2a875102/attachment-0001.html>