[CANUFNET] Tree Bylaws and infrastructure conflicts (Guy Martin) CANUFNET Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14

iolaprice iolaprice at comnet.ca
Fri Oct 31 11:03:56 EDT 2008


http://ottawa.ca/residents/healthy_lawns/forestry/foundation_en.html
Ottawa has a policy on trees and foundation damage that may help.  Iola
Price



-----Original Message-----
From: canufnet-bounces at list.web.net
[mailto:canufnet-bounces at list.web.net]On Behalf Of
canufnet-request at list.web.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 3:49 PM
To: canufnet at list.web.net
Subject: CANUFNET Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14


Send CANUFNET mailing list submissions to
	canufnet at list.web.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://list.web.net/lists/listinfo/canufnet
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	canufnet-request at list.web.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	canufnet-owner at list.web.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CANUFNET digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Tree Bylaws and infrastructure conflicts (Guy Martin)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:54:59 -0700
From: "Guy Martin" <gbmartin at langleycity.ca>
Subject: [CANUFNET] Tree Bylaws and infrastructure conflicts
To: <canufnet at list.web.net>
Message-ID: <10E2937B3C89D545A272B07D0406FD180975C9 at col000.col.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello all,



Well we are finally getting into the 21st century and have a new
director that wants to start drafting some tree bylaws.

I know that this has been discussed on this network at length but pose
this question yet again. I am looking for links to other municipalities
for their tree bylaws...we do not want to reinvent the wheel by any
means, so I am asking for your assistance.



The first thing that they would like me to look into is tree root and
infrastructure conflicts on our property in regards to private dwellings
(driveways mainly) and commercial frontages. According to the
interpretation of the Municipal Insurance Authority on this issue, once
a situation has been brought to our attention, we are obligated to
ensure that no further damage occurs. Our measures may include tree
removal (when necessary), root mitigation (when possible) and the like.
We are not responsible for the repairs unless they worsen or continue,
due to our lack of action.



The issue at play here is that when the repairs are being done, who is
going to look after the tree and specifically the roots.

My director has suggested three options:



1.       City repair with estimate, cost going to homeowner (repairs
only to property line)

2.       An approved list of contractors, ones that understand the
dynamics involved

3.       Work performed by anyone with a certified arborist on site that
will submit a report to the City of Langley



We prefer either 1 or 3 as the standard to be used. So with all that
said, I am curious as to how other municipalities handle these issues
along with the relevant bylaws.



Thank you,



Guy Martin



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://list.web.net/archives/canufnet/attachments/20081029/800282d2/attachm
ent-0001.htm>

End of CANUFNET Digest, Vol 47, Issue 14
****************************************







More information about the CANUFNET mailing list