[CANUFNET] Private Tree Bylaw administration - municipal benchmarking

[Alice Casselman]

Interesting
and congratulations on reaching out re removal

Private residential and condo owners could also be asked re interest in re planting and replacement and enhancement with even more trees - variety of native species especially  from  where  there is an already warmer climate  
AND monitoring the success of their plantings to determine future of urban forest plantings to help the municipality increase canopy with citizen participation as ACER does with Mississauga.
Alice Casselman
for ACER
www.acer-acre.ca



> On Oct 22, 2019, at 10:01 AM, Robinson, Steve via CANUFNET <canufnet at list.web.net> wrote:
> 
> Municipal Benchmarking – Private Tree Bylaws
>  
> The City of Burlington is interested in gaining insight into the nature of private tree bylaw administration from neighbouring municipalities throughout Ontario. The City is currently administering a pilot private tree bylaw within a portion of the City.  The City’s Forestry section will be drafting a recommendation report for consideration at the end of this year for Council deliberation.
> If you would kindly fill out the brief questionnaire below, it would be much appreciated.  If there is any sensitive information that you wish not to disclose, please leave your answer blank.
>  
> Municipality Name
>  
> Population/Land Area/ # of Trees
>  
> Do you currently have a Private Tree Bylaw (Y/N)
>  
> # of Forestry Staff
> Total
> Dedicated to Private Tree Bylaw administration
>  
> How much does it cost to administer the bylaw on an annual basis?
>  
> Minimum DBH protected
>  
> Are there permit fees associated with an application? If so how much?
>  
> Number of private tree removal applications received per year and type? (Dead/Diseased vs Development vs Non-Development)
>  
> Number of tree removal permits granted per year compared to applications received
>  
> How is compensation determined for trees removed? 
> (Appraised value, Replacement ratio, cash in lieu, combination) 
>  
> Is there compensation charged for trees injured? Is so, what is the mechanism?
>  
> How are violations managed?
> Short form wording
> Part III Summons (Provincial Offenses Act)
> Rates and Fees Schedule 
>  
> Any special considerations, exemptions, insights?
> Ex. Urban vs. Rural; Golf Courses; Schools; 
>  
>  
>  
> Steve Robinson
> Manager of Urban Forestry
> Roads, Parks and Forestry
> (905) 333-6166 ext.6167
> steve.robinson at burlington.ca <mailto:steve.robinson at burlington.ca>
>  <https://www.burlington.ca/en/index.asp>
>  
> This message, including any attachments, is privileged and intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not read, use or disseminate the information contained in this email/fax. If you have received this email/fax transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone, fax or email and permanently delete this email from your computer/shred this fax, including any attachments, without making a copy. Access to this email/fax by anyone else is unauthorized. Thank you.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.web.net/pipermail/canufnet/attachments/20191023/0181d1c0/attachment.htm>